diff doc/burst.me @ 0:bce86c4163a3

Initial revision
author kono
date Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:46:02 +0900
parents
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/doc/burst.me	Mon Apr 18 23:46:02 2005 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+.\"	This file is automatically generated.  Do not edit!
+.\" @(#)$Id$
+.SC BURST 1
+.NA
+burst \- explode digests into messages
+.SY
+burst
+\%[+folder] \%[msgs]
+\%[\-inplace] \%[\-noinplace]
+\%[\-quiet] \%[\-noquiet]
+\%[\-verbose] \%[\-noverbose]
+\%[\-help]
+.DE
+\fIBurst\fR considers the specified messages in the named folder to be
+Internet digests, and explodes them in that folder.
+
+If `\-inplace' is given,
+each digest is replaced by the \*(lqtable of contents\*(rq for the digest
+(the original digest is removed).
+\fIBurst\fR then renumbers all of the messages following the digest in the
+folder to make room for each of the messages contained within the digest.
+These messages are placed immediately after the digest.
+
+If `\-noinplace' is given,
+each digest is preserved,
+no table of contents is produced,
+and the messages contained within the digest are placed at the end of
+the folder.
+Other messages are not tampered with in any way.
+
+The `\-quiet' switch directs \fIburst\fR to be silent about reporting
+messages that are not in digest format.
+
+The `\-verbose' switch directs \fIburst\fR to tell the user the general
+actions that it is taking to explode the digest.
+
+It turns out that \fIburst\fR works equally well on forwarded messages and
+blind\-carbon\-copies as on Internet digests,
+provided that the former two were generated by \fIforw\fR or \fIsend\fR.
+.Fi
+^$HOME/\&.mh\(ruprofile~^The user profile
+.Pr
+^Path:~^To determine the user's MH directory
+.Ps
+^Current\-Folder:~^To find the default current folder
+.Ps
+^Msg\-Protect:~^To set mode when creating a new message
+.Sa
+\fIProposed Standard for Message Encapsulation\fR (aka RFC\-934),
+.br
+inc(1), msh(1), pack(1)
+.De
+`+folder' defaults to the current folder
+.Ds
+`msgs' defaults to cur
+.Ds
+`\-noinplace'
+.Ds
+`\-noquiet'
+.Ds
+`\-noverbose'
+.Co
+If a folder is given, it will become the current folder.
+If `\-inplace' is given,
+then the first message burst becomes the current message.
+This leaves the context ready for a \fIshow\fR of the table of contents
+of the digest, and a \fInext\fR to see the first message of the digest.
+If `\-noinplace' is given,
+then the first message extracted from the first digest burst becomes the
+current message.
+This leaves the context in a similar, but not identical,
+state to the context achieved when using `\-inplace'.
+.Bu
+The \fIburst\fR program enforces a limit on the number of messages which may
+be \fIburst\fR from a single message.
+This number is on the order of 1000 messages.
+There is usually no limit on the number of messages which may reside in the
+folder after the \fIburst\fRing.
+
+Although \fIburst\fR uses a sophisticated algorithm to determine where one
+encapsulated message ends and another begins,
+not all digestifying programs use an encapsulation algorithm.
+In degenerate cases,
+this usually results in \fIburst\fR finding an encapsulation boundary
+prematurely and splitting a single encapsulated message into two or more
+messages.
+These erroneous digestifying programs should be fixed.
+
+Furthermore,
+any text which appears after the last encapsulated message is not placed
+in a seperate message by \fIburst\fR.
+In the case of digestified messages,
+this text is usally an \*(lqEnd of digest\*(rq string.
+As a result of this possibly un\-friendly behavior on the part of \fIburst\fR,
+note that when the `\-inplace' option is used,
+this trailing information is lost.
+In practice,
+this is not a problem since correspondents usually place remarks in text
+prior to the first encapsulated message,
+and this information is not lost.
+.En