comparison gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-check-6a.c @ 111:04ced10e8804

gcc 7
author kono
date Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:46:09 +0900
parents
children 84e7813d76e9
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
68:561a7518be6b 111:04ced10e8804
1 /* The goal here is to verify that increasing the size of the guard allows
2 elimination of all probing on the relevant targets. */
3
4 /* { dg-do compile } */
5 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-clash-protection -fdump-rtl-pro_and_epilogue -fno-optimize-sibling-calls --param stack-clash-protection-probe-interval=12 --param stack-clash-protection-guard-size=16" } */
6 /* { dg-require-effective-target supports_stack_clash_protection } */
7 /* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-fstack-protector" } { "" } } */
8
9
10 #include "stack-check-6.c"
11
12 /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash inline probes" 0 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
13 /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash probe loop" 0 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
14 /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash residual allocation in prologue" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
15 /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash not noreturn" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" } } */
16
17 /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash no frame pointer needed" 4 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { ! frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */
18 /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash no frame pointer needed" 2 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */
19 /* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "Stack clash frame pointer needed" 2 "pro_and_epilogue" { target { frame_pointer_for_non_leaf } } } } */