diff gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/bit-fields2.C @ 111:04ced10e8804

gcc 7
author kono
date Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:46:09 +0900
parents
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/bit-fields2.C	Fri Oct 27 22:46:09 2017 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// { dg-do run  }
+// GROUPS passed bit-fields
+// bitfield file
+// Message-Id: <92Oct29.191913est.62@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
+// From: mdivax1!robinson@ai.mit.edu (Jim Robinson)
+// Subject: gcc 2.2.2 C++ bug in handling :0 bit fields
+// Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 1992 19:18:28 -0500
+//
+// Also applies to:
+// bitfield file
+// From: Jaimie Wilson/MSL <Jaimie_Wilson@msl.isis.org>
+// Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 1994 06:11:43 -0500
+// Subject: GCC bug report
+//
+// This test is only meant for targets where EMPTY_FIELD_BOUNDARY is
+// defined to no larger than the size of an unsigned int, or where
+// PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS is defined.  Add skips below for targets that
+// do not have that property.
+// { dg-skip-if "" { mmix-knuth-mmixware } }
+
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stddef.h>
+
+struct foo {
+        char a;
+        char b;
+        unsigned int : 0;       /* force word alignment */
+        char c;
+};
+
+int
+main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+        struct foo bar;
+
+	if (offsetof (struct foo, c) > sizeof (unsigned int))
+		{ printf ("FAIL\n"); return 1; }
+	else
+		printf ("PASS\n");
+	return 0;
+}
+