diff gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/composite-ptr-type.C @ 152:2b5abeee2509

update gcc11
author anatofuz
date Mon, 25 May 2020 07:50:57 +0900
parents
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/composite-ptr-type.C	Mon May 25 07:50:57 2020 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+// DR 1512
+// Test the composite pointer type of two operands.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+using nullptr_t = decltype(nullptr);
+
+template <class T, class U> struct same;
+template <class T> struct same<T,T> { };
+
+template<typename T>
+T fn ()
+{
+}
+
+// Check that the composite pointer type of T and U is RES.
+template<typename T, typename U, typename RES>
+void test ()
+{
+  same<decltype(true ? fn<T>() : fn<U>()), RES> s;
+}
+
+struct A { };
+struct B : A { };
+
+// Test [expr.type]/3.
+void
+foo ()
+{
+  // if both p1 and p2 are null pointer constants -> std::nullptr_­t.
+  test<nullptr_t, nullptr_t, nullptr_t>();
+
+  // if either p1 or p2 is a null pointer constant -> T2 or T1.
+  test<nullptr_t, const char **, const char **>();
+  test<const char **, nullptr_t, const char **>();
+
+  // if T1 or T2 is 'pointer to cv1 void' and the other type is 'pointer
+  // to cv2 T', where T is an object type or void -> 'pointer to cv12 void',
+  // where cv12 is the union of cv1 and cv2.
+  test<const int *, volatile void *, const volatile void *>();
+  test<const void *, volatile int *, const volatile void *>();
+
+  test<int *, const int *, const int *>();
+  // Make sure that we propagate 'const' here as per [conv.qual]/3.3.
+  test<int **, const int **, const int *const *>();
+  test<int *volatile *, const int **, const int *const volatile *>();
+  test<int **, volatile int **, volatile int *const *>();
+
+  // if T1 is 'pointer to cv1 C1' and T2 is 'pointer to cv2 C2', where C1 is
+  // reference-related to C2 or C2 is reference-related to C1 -> the cv-combined
+  // type of T1 and T2 or the cv-combined type of T2 and T1, respectively.
+  test<const A*, volatile B*, const volatile A *>();
+  test<const B*, volatile A*, const volatile A *>();
+
+  test<const int *A::*, volatile int *A::*, const volatile int *const A::*>();
+  // FIXME: This doesn't work if they're reference-related but not same.
+  //test<const int *A::*, volatile int *B::*, const volatile int *const B::*>();
+  //test<const int *B::*, volatile int *A::*, const volatile int *const B::*>();
+
+  // if T1 or T2 is 'pointer to noexcept function' and the other type is
+  // 'pointer to function', where the function types are otherwise the same
+  // -> 'pointer to function'.
+  test<int (*)() noexcept, int (*)(), int (*)()>();
+  test<int (*)(), int (*)() noexcept, int (*)()>();
+
+  // if T1 or T2 is 'pointer to member of C1 of type function', the other type
+  // is 'pointer to member of C2 of type noexcept function', and C1 is
+  // reference-related to C2 or C2 is reference-related to C1, where the
+  // function types are otherwise the same -> 'pointer to member of C2 of type
+  // function' or 'pointer to member of C1 of type function', respectively.
+  test<int (A::*)() noexcept, int (A::*)(), int (A::*)()>();
+  test<int (A::*)(), int (A::*)() noexcept, int (A::*)()>();
+}