Mercurial > hg > CbC > CbC_gcc
diff gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/composite-ptr-type.C @ 152:2b5abeee2509
update gcc11
author | anatofuz |
---|---|
date | Mon, 25 May 2020 07:50:57 +0900 |
parents | |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/expr/composite-ptr-type.C Mon May 25 07:50:57 2020 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +// DR 1512 +// Test the composite pointer type of two operands. +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } + +using nullptr_t = decltype(nullptr); + +template <class T, class U> struct same; +template <class T> struct same<T,T> { }; + +template<typename T> +T fn () +{ +} + +// Check that the composite pointer type of T and U is RES. +template<typename T, typename U, typename RES> +void test () +{ + same<decltype(true ? fn<T>() : fn<U>()), RES> s; +} + +struct A { }; +struct B : A { }; + +// Test [expr.type]/3. +void +foo () +{ + // if both p1 and p2 are null pointer constants -> std::nullptr_t. + test<nullptr_t, nullptr_t, nullptr_t>(); + + // if either p1 or p2 is a null pointer constant -> T2 or T1. + test<nullptr_t, const char **, const char **>(); + test<const char **, nullptr_t, const char **>(); + + // if T1 or T2 is 'pointer to cv1 void' and the other type is 'pointer + // to cv2 T', where T is an object type or void -> 'pointer to cv12 void', + // where cv12 is the union of cv1 and cv2. + test<const int *, volatile void *, const volatile void *>(); + test<const void *, volatile int *, const volatile void *>(); + + test<int *, const int *, const int *>(); + // Make sure that we propagate 'const' here as per [conv.qual]/3.3. + test<int **, const int **, const int *const *>(); + test<int *volatile *, const int **, const int *const volatile *>(); + test<int **, volatile int **, volatile int *const *>(); + + // if T1 is 'pointer to cv1 C1' and T2 is 'pointer to cv2 C2', where C1 is + // reference-related to C2 or C2 is reference-related to C1 -> the cv-combined + // type of T1 and T2 or the cv-combined type of T2 and T1, respectively. + test<const A*, volatile B*, const volatile A *>(); + test<const B*, volatile A*, const volatile A *>(); + + test<const int *A::*, volatile int *A::*, const volatile int *const A::*>(); + // FIXME: This doesn't work if they're reference-related but not same. + //test<const int *A::*, volatile int *B::*, const volatile int *const B::*>(); + //test<const int *B::*, volatile int *A::*, const volatile int *const B::*>(); + + // if T1 or T2 is 'pointer to noexcept function' and the other type is + // 'pointer to function', where the function types are otherwise the same + // -> 'pointer to function'. + test<int (*)() noexcept, int (*)(), int (*)()>(); + test<int (*)(), int (*)() noexcept, int (*)()>(); + + // if T1 or T2 is 'pointer to member of C1 of type function', the other type + // is 'pointer to member of C2 of type noexcept function', and C1 is + // reference-related to C2 or C2 is reference-related to C1, where the + // function types are otherwise the same -> 'pointer to member of C2 of type + // function' or 'pointer to member of C1 of type function', respectively. + test<int (A::*)() noexcept, int (A::*)(), int (A::*)()>(); + test<int (A::*)(), int (A::*)() noexcept, int (A::*)()>(); +}