diff gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/pr94613.c @ 152:2b5abeee2509

update gcc11
author anatofuz
date Mon, 25 May 2020 07:50:57 +0900
parents
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/zvector/pr94613.c	Mon May 25 07:50:57 2020 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target s390_vx } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -mzarch -march=arch13 -mzvector -std=gnu99 --save-temps" } */
+
+#include <vecintrin.h>
+
+/* The initial implementation of vec_sel used an IF_THEN_ELSE rtx.
+   This did NOT match what the vsel instruction does.  vsel is a
+   bit-wise operation.  Using IF_THEN_ELSE made the + operation to be
+   simplified away in combine.  A plus operation affects other bits in
+   the same element. Hence per-element simplifications are wrong for
+   vsel.  */
+vector unsigned char __attribute__((noinline))
+foo (vector unsigned char a, vector unsigned char b, vector unsigned char c)
+{
+  return vec_sel (a + b, c, a);
+}
+
+/* FIXME: The OR operation still should be optimized away in that case.  */
+vector unsigned char __attribute__((noinline))
+bar (vector unsigned char a, vector unsigned char b, vector unsigned char c)
+{
+  return vec_sel (a | b, c, a);
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  vector unsigned char v = (vector unsigned char){ 1 };
+
+  if (foo (v, v, v)[0] != 3)
+      __builtin_abort ();
+
+  if (bar (v, v, v)[0] != 1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+
+  return 0;
+}