Mercurial > hg > Members > atton > intelligence_robotics
diff slide.md @ 10:62f384a20c2c
fix
author | tatsuki |
---|---|
date | Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:09:58 +0900 |
parents | 8a6f547b72c0 |
children | 7104d522d2f0 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/slide.md Thu Jun 25 06:07:48 2015 +0900 +++ b/slide.md Fri Jun 26 09:09:58 2015 +0900 @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ # Implementation on ARMAR-IIIb * ARMAR-III is designed for close cooperation with humans * ARMAR-III has a humanlike appearance -* sensory capabilities similar to humans( +* sensory capabilities similar to humans * ARMAR-IIIb is a slightly modified version with different shape to the head, the trunk, and the hands # Implementation of gestures @@ -177,18 +177,21 @@ * providing a unified representation of various human motion capture systems, action recognition systems, imitation systems, visualization modules * This representation can be subsequently converted to other representations, such as action recognizers, 3D visualization, or implementation into different robots * The MMM is intended to become a common standard in the robotics community + +# Master Motor Map <img src="pictures/MMM.png" style='width: 60%; margin-left: 150px; margin-top: -50px;'> -# Master Motor Map2 +# Master Motor Map * The body model of MMM model can be seen in the left-hand illustration in Figure * It contains some joints, such as the clavicula, which are usually not implemented in humanoid robots * A conversion module is necessary to perform a transformation between this kinematic model and ARMAR-IIIb kinematic model + +# Master Motor Map <img src="pictures/MMMModel.png" style='width: 60%; margin-left: 150px; margin-top: -50px;'> # converter * converter given joint angles would consist in a one-to-one mapping between an observed human subject and the robot -* differences in the kinematic structures of a human and the robot one-to-one mapping can hardly show acceptable results in terms of a human like appearance of the reproduced movement -* this problem is addressed by applying a post-processing procedure in joint angle space +* convert is addressed by applying a post-processing procedure in joint angle space * the joint angles, given in the MMM format,are optimized concerning the tool centre point position * solution is estimated by using the joint configuration of the MMM model on the robot @@ -201,7 +204,6 @@ # Conversion example of MMM * After programming the postures directly on the MMM model they were processed by the converter -* Conversion is not easy * the human model contains many joints, which are not present in the robot configuration * ARMAR is not bending the body when performing a bow * It was expressed using a portion present in the robot (e.g., the neck) @@ -217,6 +219,8 @@ * The postures could be triggered from the MCA (Modular Controller Architecture, a modular software framework)interface, where the greetings model was also implemented * the list of postures is on the left together with the option * When that option is activated, it is possible to select the context parameters through the radio buttons on the right + +# Modular Controller Architecture, a modular software framework <img src="pictures/MCA.png" style='width: 60%; margin-left: 150px; margin-top: -50px;'> # Implementation of words @@ -237,8 +241,8 @@ * added two small speakers behind the head and connected them to another computer # Experiment description -* Experiments were conducted at room as shown in Figure 9 , Germany -<img src="pictures/room.png" style='width: 60%; margin-left: 150px; margin-top: -50px;'> +* Experiments were conducted at room as shown in Figure , Germany +<img src="pictures/room.png" style='width: 60%; margin-left: 150px; margin-top: 50px;'> # Experiment description2 @@ -268,11 +272,6 @@ 2. average age: 29.43 3. age standard deviation: 12.46 -# The purpose of the experiment -* The objective of the experiment was to adapt ARMAR-IIIb greeting behaviour from Japanese to German culture -* the algorithm working for ARMAR was trained with only Japanese sociology data and two mappings M0J were built for gestures and words -* After interacting with German people, the resulting mappings M1 were expected to synthesize the rules of greeting interaction in Germany - # The experiment protocol is as follows 1~5 1. ARMAR-IIIb is trained with Japanese data 2. encounter are given as inputs to the algorithm and the robot is prepared @@ -292,28 +291,28 @@ * It has become common Bowing is greatly reduced handshake * It has appeared hug that does not exist in Japan of mapping * This is because the participants issued a feedback that hug is appropriate + +# Results <img src="pictures/GestureTable.png" style='width: 60%; margin-left: 150px; margin-top: -50px;'> -# Results2 +# Results * The biggest change in the words of the mapping , are gone workplace of greeting * Is the use of informal greeting as a small amount of change -* some other patterns can be found in the gestures mappings judging from the columns in Table 3 for T = 0 -* Japan there is a pattern to the gesture by social distance -* But in Germany not the pattern -* This is characteristic of Japanese society -* The two mapping has been referring to the feedback of the Japanese sociology literature and the German participants + +# Results <img src="pictures/GreetingWordTable.png" style='width: 60%; margin-left: 150px; margin-top: -50px;'> # Limitations and improvements -* In the current implementation, there are also a few limitations * The first obvious limitation is related to the manual input of context data -* → The integrated use of cameras would make it possible to determine features such as gender, age, and race of the human +* The integrated use of cameras would make it possible to determine features such as gender, age, and race of the human + +# Limitations and improvements +* Robot itself , to determine whether the greeting was correct * Speech recognition system and cameras could also detect the human own greeting -* → Robot itself , to determine whether the greeting was correct * The decision to check the distance to the partner , the timing of the greeting , head orientation , or to use other information , whether the response to a greeting is correct and what is expected -* Accurate der than this information is information collected using a questionnaire + +#Limitations and improvements * It is possible to extend the set of context by using a plurality of documents -* This in simplification of greeting model was canceled # Different kinds of embodiment * Humanoid robot has a body similar to the human