Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > ZF-in-agda
comparison cardinal.agda @ 254:2ea2a19f9cd6
ordered pair clean up
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:16:51 +0900 |
parents | 0446b6c5e7bc |
children | 53b7acd63481 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
253:0446b6c5e7bc | 254:2ea2a19f9cd6 |
---|---|
18 open OD.OD | 18 open OD.OD |
19 | 19 |
20 open _∧_ | 20 open _∧_ |
21 open _∨_ | 21 open _∨_ |
22 open Bool | 22 open Bool |
23 open _==_ | |
23 | 24 |
24 -- we have to work on Ordinal to keep OD Level n | 25 -- we have to work on Ordinal to keep OD Level n |
25 -- since we use p∨¬p which works only on Level n | 26 -- since we use p∨¬p which works only on Level n |
26 | 27 -- < x , y > = (x , x) , (x , y) |
27 <_,_> : (x y : OD) → OD | |
28 < x , y > = (x , x ) , (x , y ) | |
29 | |
30 open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) | |
31 | |
32 | |
33 open _==_ | |
34 | |
35 exg-pair : { x y : OD } → (x , y ) == ( y , x ) | |
36 exg-pair {x} {y} = record { eq→ = left ; eq← = right } where | |
37 left : {z : Ordinal} → def (x , y) z → def (y , x) z | |
38 left (case1 t) = case2 t | |
39 left (case2 t) = case1 t | |
40 right : {z : Ordinal} → def (y , x) z → def (x , y) z | |
41 right (case1 t) = case2 t | |
42 right (case2 t) = case1 t | |
43 | |
44 ==-trans : { x y z : OD } → x == y → y == z → x == z | |
45 ==-trans x=y y=z = record { eq→ = λ {m} t → eq→ y=z (eq→ x=y t) ; eq← = λ {m} t → eq← x=y (eq← y=z t) } | |
46 | |
47 ==-sym : { x y : OD } → x == y → y == x | |
48 ==-sym x=y = record { eq→ = λ {m} t → eq← x=y t ; eq← = λ {m} t → eq→ x=y t } | |
49 | |
50 ord≡→≡ : { x y : OD } → od→ord x ≡ od→ord y → x ≡ y | |
51 ord≡→≡ eq = subst₂ (λ j k → j ≡ k ) oiso oiso ( cong ( λ k → ord→od k ) eq ) | |
52 | |
53 od≡→≡ : { x y : Ordinal } → ord→od x ≡ ord→od y → x ≡ y | |
54 od≡→≡ eq = subst₂ (λ j k → j ≡ k ) diso diso ( cong ( λ k → od→ord k ) eq ) | |
55 | |
56 eq-prod : { x x' y y' : OD } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → < x , y > ≡ < x' , y' > | |
57 eq-prod refl refl = refl | |
58 | |
59 prod-eq : { x x' y y' : OD } → < x , y > == < x' , y' > → (x ≡ x' ) ∧ ( y ≡ y' ) | |
60 prod-eq {x} {x'} {y} {y'} eq = record { proj1 = lemmax ; proj2 = lemmay } where | |
61 lemma0 : {x y z : OD } → ( x , x ) == ( z , y ) → x ≡ y | |
62 lemma0 {x} {y} eq with trio< (od→ord x) (od→ord y) | |
63 lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c with eq← eq {od→ord y} (case2 refl) | |
64 lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c | case1 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ (sym s) a ) | |
65 lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c | case2 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ (sym s) a ) | |
66 lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = ord≡→≡ b | |
67 lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c with eq← eq {od→ord y} (case2 refl) | |
68 lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c | case1 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ s c ) | |
69 lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c | case2 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ s c ) | |
70 lemma2 : {x y z : OD } → ( x , x ) == ( z , y ) → z ≡ y | |
71 lemma2 {x} {y} {z} eq = trans (sym (lemma0 lemma3 )) ( lemma0 eq ) where | |
72 lemma3 : ( x , x ) == ( y , z ) | |
73 lemma3 = ==-trans eq exg-pair | |
74 lemma1 : {x y : OD } → ( x , x ) == ( y , y ) → x ≡ y | |
75 lemma1 {x} {y} eq with eq← eq {od→ord y} (case2 refl) | |
76 lemma1 {x} {y} eq | case1 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) | |
77 lemma1 {x} {y} eq | case2 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) | |
78 lemma4 : {x y z : OD } → ( x , y ) == ( x , z ) → y ≡ z | |
79 lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq with eq← eq {od→ord z} (case2 refl) | |
80 lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq | case1 s with ord≡→≡ s -- x ≡ z | |
81 ... | refl with lemma2 (==-sym eq ) | |
82 ... | refl = refl | |
83 lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq | case2 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) -- y ≡ z | |
84 lemmax : x ≡ x' | |
85 lemmax with eq→ eq {od→ord (x , x)} (case1 refl) | |
86 lemmax | case1 s = lemma1 (ord→== s ) -- (x,x)≡(x',x') | |
87 lemmax | case2 s with lemma2 (ord→== s ) -- (x,x)≡(x',y') with x'≡y' | |
88 ... | refl = lemma1 (ord→== s ) | |
89 lemmay : y ≡ y' | |
90 lemmay with lemmax | |
91 ... | refl with lemma4 eq -- with (x,y)≡(x,y') | |
92 ... | eq1 = lemma4 (ord→== (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) eq1 )) | |
93 | |
94 | 28 |
95 data ord-pair : (p : Ordinal) → Set n where | 29 data ord-pair : (p : Ordinal) → Set n where |
96 pair : (x y : Ordinal ) → ord-pair ( od→ord ( < ord→od x , ord→od y > ) ) | 30 pair : (x y : Ordinal ) → ord-pair ( od→ord ( < ord→od x , ord→od y > ) ) |
97 | 31 |
98 ZFProduct : OD | 32 ZFProduct : OD |
99 ZFProduct = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x } | 33 ZFProduct = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x } |
100 | 34 |
101 eq-pair : { x x' y y' : Ordinal } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → pair x y ≅ pair x' y' | 35 -- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) |
102 eq-pair refl refl = HE.refl | 36 -- eq-pair : { x x' y y' : Ordinal } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → pair x y ≅ pair x' y' |
37 -- eq-pair refl refl = HE.refl | |
103 | 38 |
104 pi1 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal | 39 pi1 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal |
105 pi1 ( pair x y) = x | 40 pi1 ( pair x y) = x |
106 | 41 |
107 π1 : { p : OD } → ZFProduct ∋ p → Ordinal | 42 π1 : { p : OD } → ZFProduct ∋ p → Ordinal |
124 | 59 |
125 p-iso1 : { ox oy : Ordinal } → ZFProduct ∋ < ord→od ox , ord→od oy > | 60 p-iso1 : { ox oy : Ordinal } → ZFProduct ∋ < ord→od ox , ord→od oy > |
126 p-iso1 {ox} {oy} = pair ox oy | 61 p-iso1 {ox} {oy} = pair ox oy |
127 | 62 |
128 p-iso : { x : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ x ) → < ord→od (π1 p) , ord→od (π2 p) > ≡ x | 63 p-iso : { x : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ x ) → < ord→od (π1 p) , ord→od (π2 p) > ≡ x |
129 p-iso {x} p = ord≡→≡ (lemma2 p) where | 64 p-iso {x} p = ord≡→≡ (lemma p) where |
130 lemma : { op : Ordinal } → (q : ord-pair op ) → od→ord < ord→od (pi1 q) , ord→od (pi2 q) > ≡ op | 65 lemma : { op : Ordinal } → (q : ord-pair op ) → od→ord < ord→od (pi1 q) , ord→od (pi2 q) > ≡ op |
131 lemma (pair ox oy) = refl | 66 lemma (pair ox oy) = refl |
132 lemma2 : { x : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ x ) → od→ord < ord→od (π1 p) , ord→od (π2 p) > ≡ od→ord x | |
133 lemma2 {x} p = lemma p | |
134 | 67 |
135 | 68 |
136 ∋-p : (A x : OD ) → Dec ( A ∋ x ) | 69 ∋-p : (A x : OD ) → Dec ( A ∋ x ) |
137 ∋-p A x with p∨¬p ( A ∋ x ) | 70 ∋-p A x with p∨¬p ( A ∋ x ) |
138 ∋-p A x | case1 t = yes t | 71 ∋-p A x | case1 t = yes t |