Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > ZF-in-agda
comparison OD.agda @ 334:ba3ebb9a16c6 release
HOD
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 05 Jul 2020 16:59:13 +0900 |
parents | 0faa7120e4b5 |
children | daafa2213dd2 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
289:9f926b2210bc | 334:ba3ebb9a16c6 |
---|---|
51 ⇔→== : { x y : OD } → ( {z : Ordinal } → def x z ⇔ def y z) → x == y | 51 ⇔→== : { x y : OD } → ( {z : Ordinal } → def x z ⇔ def y z) → x == y |
52 eq→ ( ⇔→== {x} {y} eq ) {z} m = proj1 eq m | 52 eq→ ( ⇔→== {x} {y} eq ) {z} m = proj1 eq m |
53 eq← ( ⇔→== {x} {y} eq ) {z} m = proj2 eq m | 53 eq← ( ⇔→== {x} {y} eq ) {z} m = proj2 eq m |
54 | 54 |
55 -- next assumptions are our axiom | 55 -- next assumptions are our axiom |
56 -- it defines a subset of OD, which is called HOD, usually defined as | 56 -- |
57 -- OD is an equation on Ordinals, so it contains Ordinals. If these Ordinals have one-to-one | |
58 -- correspondence to the OD then the OD looks like a ZF Set. | |
59 -- | |
60 -- If all ZF Set have supreme upper bound, the solutions of OD have to be bounded, i.e. | |
61 -- bbounded ODs are ZF Set. Unbounded ODs are classes. | |
62 -- | |
63 -- In classical Set Theory, HOD is used, as a subset of OD, | |
57 -- HOD = { x | TC x ⊆ OD } | 64 -- HOD = { x | TC x ⊆ OD } |
58 -- where TC x is a transitive clusure of x, i.e. Union of all elemnts of all subset of x | 65 -- where TC x is a transitive clusure of x, i.e. Union of all elemnts of all subset of x. |
59 | 66 -- This is not possible because we don't have V yet. So we assumes HODs are bounded OD. |
60 record ODAxiom : Set (suc n) where | 67 -- |
61 -- OD can be iso to a subset of Ordinal ( by means of Godel Set ) | 68 -- We also assumes HODs are isomorphic to Ordinals, which is ususally proved by Goedel number tricks. |
62 field | 69 -- There two contraints on the HOD order, one is ∋, the other one is ⊂. |
63 od→ord : OD → Ordinal | 70 -- ODs have an ovbious maximum, but Ordinals are not, but HOD has no maximum because there is an aribtrary |
64 ord→od : Ordinal → OD | 71 -- bound on each HOD. |
65 c<→o< : {x y : OD } → def y ( od→ord x ) → od→ord x o< od→ord y | 72 -- |
66 oiso : {x : OD } → ord→od ( od→ord x ) ≡ x | 73 -- In classical Set Theory, sup is defined by Uion, since we are working on constructive logic, |
67 diso : {x : Ordinal } → od→ord ( ord→od x ) ≡ x | 74 -- we need explict assumption on sup. |
68 ==→o≡ : { x y : OD } → (x == y) → x ≡ y | 75 -- |
69 -- supermum as Replacement Axiom ( corresponding Ordinal of OD has maximum ) | 76 -- ==→o≡ is necessary to prove axiom of extensionality. |
70 sup-o : ( OD → Ordinal ) → Ordinal | |
71 sup-o< : { ψ : OD → Ordinal } → ∀ {x : OD } → ψ x o< sup-o ψ | |
72 -- contra-position of mimimulity of supermum required in Power Set Axiom which we don't use | |
73 -- sup-x : {n : Level } → ( OD → Ordinal ) → Ordinal | |
74 -- sup-lb : {n : Level } → { ψ : OD → Ordinal } → {z : Ordinal } → z o< sup-o ψ → z o< osuc (ψ (sup-x ψ)) | |
75 | |
76 postulate odAxiom : ODAxiom | |
77 open ODAxiom odAxiom | |
78 | 77 |
79 data One : Set n where | 78 data One : Set n where |
80 OneObj : One | 79 OneObj : One |
81 | 80 |
82 -- Ordinals in OD , the maximum | 81 -- Ordinals in OD , the maximum |
83 Ords : OD | 82 Ords : OD |
84 Ords = record { def = λ x → One } | 83 Ords = record { def = λ x → One } |
85 | 84 |
86 maxod : {x : OD} → od→ord x o< od→ord Ords | 85 record HOD : Set (suc n) where |
87 maxod {x} = c<→o< OneObj | 86 field |
87 od : OD | |
88 odmax : Ordinal | |
89 <odmax : {y : Ordinal} → def od y → y o< odmax | |
90 | |
91 open HOD | |
92 | |
93 record ODAxiom : Set (suc n) where | |
94 field | |
95 -- HOD is isomorphic to Ordinal (by means of Goedel number) | |
96 od→ord : HOD → Ordinal | |
97 ord→od : Ordinal → HOD | |
98 c<→o< : {x y : HOD } → def (od y) ( od→ord x ) → od→ord x o< od→ord y | |
99 ⊆→o≤ : {y z : HOD } → ({x : Ordinal} → def (od y) x → def (od z) x ) → od→ord y o< osuc (od→ord z) | |
100 oiso : {x : HOD } → ord→od ( od→ord x ) ≡ x | |
101 diso : {x : Ordinal } → od→ord ( ord→od x ) ≡ x | |
102 ==→o≡ : { x y : HOD } → (od x == od y) → x ≡ y | |
103 sup-o : (A : HOD) → (( x : Ordinal ) → def (od A) x → Ordinal ) → Ordinal | |
104 sup-o< : (A : HOD) → { ψ : ( x : Ordinal ) → def (od A) x → Ordinal } → ∀ {x : Ordinal } → (lt : def (od A) x ) → ψ x lt o< sup-o A ψ | |
105 | |
106 postulate odAxiom : ODAxiom | |
107 open ODAxiom odAxiom | |
108 | |
109 -- maxod : {x : OD} → od→ord x o< od→ord Ords | |
110 -- maxod {x} = c<→o< OneObj | |
111 | |
112 -- we have not this contradiction | |
113 -- bad-bad : ⊥ | |
114 -- bad-bad = osuc-< <-osuc (c<→o< { record { od = record { def = λ x → One }; <odmax = {!!} } } OneObj) | |
88 | 115 |
89 -- Ordinal in OD ( and ZFSet ) Transitive Set | 116 -- Ordinal in OD ( and ZFSet ) Transitive Set |
90 Ord : ( a : Ordinal ) → OD | 117 Ord : ( a : Ordinal ) → HOD |
91 Ord a = record { def = λ y → y o< a } | 118 Ord a = record { od = record { def = λ y → y o< a } ; odmax = a ; <odmax = lemma } where |
92 | 119 lemma : {x : Ordinal} → x o< a → x o< a |
93 od∅ : OD | 120 lemma {x} lt = lt |
121 | |
122 od∅ : HOD | |
94 od∅ = Ord o∅ | 123 od∅ = Ord o∅ |
95 | 124 |
96 | 125 odef : HOD → Ordinal → Set n |
97 o<→c<→OD=Ord : ( {x y : Ordinal } → x o< y → def (ord→od y) x ) → {x : OD } → x ≡ Ord (od→ord x) | 126 odef A x = def ( od A ) x |
98 o<→c<→OD=Ord o<→c< {x} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where | 127 |
99 lemma1 : {y : Ordinal} → def x y → def (Ord (od→ord x)) y | 128 o<→c<→HOD=Ord : ( {x y : Ordinal } → x o< y → odef (ord→od y) x ) → {x : HOD } → x ≡ Ord (od→ord x) |
100 lemma1 {y} lt = subst ( λ k → k o< od→ord x ) diso (c<→o< {ord→od y} {x} (subst (λ k → def x k ) (sym diso) lt)) | 129 o<→c<→HOD=Ord o<→c< {x} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where |
101 lemma2 : {y : Ordinal} → def (Ord (od→ord x)) y → def x y | 130 lemma1 : {y : Ordinal} → odef x y → odef (Ord (od→ord x)) y |
102 lemma2 {y} lt = subst (λ k → def k y ) oiso (o<→c< {y} {od→ord x} lt ) | 131 lemma1 {y} lt = subst ( λ k → k o< od→ord x ) diso (c<→o< {ord→od y} {x} (subst (λ k → odef x k ) (sym diso) lt)) |
103 | 132 lemma2 : {y : Ordinal} → odef (Ord (od→ord x)) y → odef x y |
104 _∋_ : ( a x : OD ) → Set n | 133 lemma2 {y} lt = subst (λ k → odef k y ) oiso (o<→c< {y} {od→ord x} lt ) |
105 _∋_ a x = def a ( od→ord x ) | 134 |
106 | 135 |
107 _c<_ : ( x a : OD ) → Set n | 136 _∋_ : ( a x : HOD ) → Set n |
137 _∋_ a x = odef a ( od→ord x ) | |
138 | |
139 _c<_ : ( x a : HOD ) → Set n | |
108 x c< a = a ∋ x | 140 x c< a = a ∋ x |
109 | 141 |
110 cseq : {n : Level} → OD → OD | 142 cseq : {n : Level} → HOD → HOD |
111 cseq x = record { def = λ y → def x (osuc y) } where | 143 cseq x = record { od = record { def = λ y → odef x (osuc y) } ; odmax = osuc (odmax x) ; <odmax = lemma } where |
112 | 144 lemma : {y : Ordinal} → def (od x) (osuc y) → y o< osuc (odmax x) |
113 def-subst : {Z : OD } {X : Ordinal }{z : OD } {x : Ordinal }→ def Z X → Z ≡ z → X ≡ x → def z x | 145 lemma {y} lt = ordtrans <-osuc (ordtrans (<odmax x lt) <-osuc ) |
114 def-subst df refl refl = df | 146 |
115 | 147 odef-subst : {Z : HOD } {X : Ordinal }{z : HOD } {x : Ordinal }→ odef Z X → Z ≡ z → X ≡ x → odef z x |
116 sup-od : ( OD → OD ) → OD | 148 odef-subst df refl refl = df |
117 sup-od ψ = Ord ( sup-o ( λ x → od→ord (ψ x)) ) | 149 |
118 | 150 otrans : {n : Level} {a x y : Ordinal } → odef (Ord a) x → odef (Ord x) y → odef (Ord a) y |
119 sup-c< : ( ψ : OD → OD ) → ∀ {x : OD } → def ( sup-od ψ ) (od→ord ( ψ x )) | |
120 sup-c< ψ {x} = def-subst {_} {_} {Ord ( sup-o ( λ x → od→ord (ψ x)) )} {od→ord ( ψ x )} | |
121 lemma refl (cong ( λ k → od→ord (ψ k) ) oiso) where | |
122 lemma : od→ord (ψ (ord→od (od→ord x))) o< sup-o (λ x → od→ord (ψ x)) | |
123 lemma = subst₂ (λ j k → j o< k ) refl diso (o<-subst (sup-o< ) refl (sym diso) ) | |
124 | |
125 otrans : {n : Level} {a x y : Ordinal } → def (Ord a) x → def (Ord x) y → def (Ord a) y | |
126 otrans x<a y<x = ordtrans y<x x<a | 151 otrans x<a y<x = ordtrans y<x x<a |
127 | 152 |
128 def→o< : {X : OD } → {x : Ordinal } → def X x → x o< od→ord X | 153 odef→o< : {X : HOD } → {x : Ordinal } → odef X x → x o< od→ord X |
129 def→o< {X} {x} lt = o<-subst {_} {_} {x} {od→ord X} ( c<→o< ( def-subst {X} {x} lt (sym oiso) (sym diso) )) diso diso | 154 odef→o< {X} {x} lt = o<-subst {_} {_} {x} {od→ord X} ( c<→o< ( odef-subst {X} {x} lt (sym oiso) (sym diso) )) diso diso |
130 | |
131 | 155 |
132 -- avoiding lv != Zero error | 156 -- avoiding lv != Zero error |
133 orefl : { x : OD } → { y : Ordinal } → od→ord x ≡ y → od→ord x ≡ y | 157 orefl : { x : HOD } → { y : Ordinal } → od→ord x ≡ y → od→ord x ≡ y |
134 orefl refl = refl | 158 orefl refl = refl |
135 | 159 |
136 ==-iso : { x y : OD } → ord→od (od→ord x) == ord→od (od→ord y) → x == y | 160 ==-iso : { x y : HOD } → od (ord→od (od→ord x)) == od (ord→od (od→ord y)) → od x == od y |
137 ==-iso {x} {y} eq = record { | 161 ==-iso {x} {y} eq = record { |
138 eq→ = λ d → lemma ( eq→ eq (def-subst d (sym oiso) refl )) ; | 162 eq→ = λ d → lemma ( eq→ eq (odef-subst d (sym oiso) refl )) ; |
139 eq← = λ d → lemma ( eq← eq (def-subst d (sym oiso) refl )) } | 163 eq← = λ d → lemma ( eq← eq (odef-subst d (sym oiso) refl )) } |
140 where | 164 where |
141 lemma : {x : OD } {z : Ordinal } → def (ord→od (od→ord x)) z → def x z | 165 lemma : {x : HOD } {z : Ordinal } → odef (ord→od (od→ord x)) z → odef x z |
142 lemma {x} {z} d = def-subst d oiso refl | 166 lemma {x} {z} d = odef-subst d oiso refl |
143 | 167 |
144 =-iso : {x y : OD } → (x == y) ≡ (ord→od (od→ord x) == y) | 168 =-iso : {x y : HOD } → (od x == od y) ≡ (od (ord→od (od→ord x)) == od y) |
145 =-iso {_} {y} = cong ( λ k → k == y ) (sym oiso) | 169 =-iso {_} {y} = cong ( λ k → od k == od y ) (sym oiso) |
146 | 170 |
147 ord→== : { x y : OD } → od→ord x ≡ od→ord y → x == y | 171 ord→== : { x y : HOD } → od→ord x ≡ od→ord y → od x == od y |
148 ord→== {x} {y} eq = ==-iso (lemma (od→ord x) (od→ord y) (orefl eq)) where | 172 ord→== {x} {y} eq = ==-iso (lemma (od→ord x) (od→ord y) (orefl eq)) where |
149 lemma : ( ox oy : Ordinal ) → ox ≡ oy → (ord→od ox) == (ord→od oy) | 173 lemma : ( ox oy : Ordinal ) → ox ≡ oy → od (ord→od ox) == od (ord→od oy) |
150 lemma ox ox refl = ==-refl | 174 lemma ox ox refl = ==-refl |
151 | 175 |
152 o≡→== : { x y : Ordinal } → x ≡ y → ord→od x == ord→od y | 176 o≡→== : { x y : Ordinal } → x ≡ y → od (ord→od x) == od (ord→od y) |
153 o≡→== {x} {.x} refl = ==-refl | 177 o≡→== {x} {.x} refl = ==-refl |
154 | 178 |
155 o∅≡od∅ : ord→od (o∅ ) ≡ od∅ | 179 o∅≡od∅ : ord→od (o∅ ) ≡ od∅ |
156 o∅≡od∅ = ==→o≡ lemma where | 180 o∅≡od∅ = ==→o≡ lemma where |
157 lemma0 : {x : Ordinal} → def (ord→od o∅) x → def od∅ x | 181 lemma0 : {x : Ordinal} → odef (ord→od o∅) x → odef od∅ x |
158 lemma0 {x} lt = o<-subst (c<→o< {ord→od x} {ord→od o∅} (def-subst {ord→od o∅} {x} lt refl (sym diso)) ) diso diso | 182 lemma0 {x} lt = o<-subst (c<→o< {ord→od x} {ord→od o∅} (odef-subst {ord→od o∅} {x} lt refl (sym diso)) ) diso diso |
159 lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → def od∅ x → def (ord→od o∅) x | 183 lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → odef od∅ x → odef (ord→od o∅) x |
160 lemma1 {x} lt = ⊥-elim (¬x<0 lt) | 184 lemma1 {x} lt = ⊥-elim (¬x<0 lt) |
161 lemma : ord→od o∅ == od∅ | 185 lemma : od (ord→od o∅) == od od∅ |
162 lemma = record { eq→ = lemma0 ; eq← = lemma1 } | 186 lemma = record { eq→ = lemma0 ; eq← = lemma1 } |
163 | 187 |
164 ord-od∅ : od→ord (od∅ ) ≡ o∅ | 188 ord-od∅ : od→ord (od∅ ) ≡ o∅ |
165 ord-od∅ = sym ( subst (λ k → k ≡ od→ord (od∅ ) ) diso (cong ( λ k → od→ord k ) o∅≡od∅ ) ) | 189 ord-od∅ = sym ( subst (λ k → k ≡ od→ord (od∅ ) ) diso (cong ( λ k → od→ord k ) o∅≡od∅ ) ) |
166 | 190 |
167 ∅0 : record { def = λ x → Lift n ⊥ } == od∅ | 191 ∅0 : record { def = λ x → Lift n ⊥ } == od od∅ |
168 eq→ ∅0 {w} (lift ()) | 192 eq→ ∅0 {w} (lift ()) |
169 eq← ∅0 {w} lt = lift (¬x<0 lt) | 193 eq← ∅0 {w} lt = lift (¬x<0 lt) |
170 | 194 |
171 ∅< : { x y : OD } → def x (od→ord y ) → ¬ ( x == od∅ ) | 195 ∅< : { x y : HOD } → odef x (od→ord y ) → ¬ ( od x == od od∅ ) |
172 ∅< {x} {y} d eq with eq→ (==-trans eq (==-sym ∅0) ) d | 196 ∅< {x} {y} d eq with eq→ (==-trans eq (==-sym ∅0) ) d |
173 ∅< {x} {y} d eq | lift () | 197 ∅< {x} {y} d eq | lift () |
174 | 198 |
175 ∅6 : { x : OD } → ¬ ( x ∋ x ) -- no Russel paradox | 199 ∅6 : { x : HOD } → ¬ ( x ∋ x ) -- no Russel paradox |
176 ∅6 {x} x∋x = o<¬≡ refl ( c<→o< {x} {x} x∋x ) | 200 ∅6 {x} x∋x = o<¬≡ refl ( c<→o< {x} {x} x∋x ) |
177 | 201 |
178 def-iso : {A B : OD } {x y : Ordinal } → x ≡ y → (def A y → def B y) → def A x → def B x | 202 odef-iso : {A B : HOD } {x y : Ordinal } → x ≡ y → (odef A y → odef B y) → odef A x → odef B x |
179 def-iso refl t = t | 203 odef-iso refl t = t |
180 | 204 |
181 is-o∅ : ( x : Ordinal ) → Dec ( x ≡ o∅ ) | 205 is-o∅ : ( x : Ordinal ) → Dec ( x ≡ o∅ ) |
182 is-o∅ x with trio< x o∅ | 206 is-o∅ x with trio< x o∅ |
183 is-o∅ x | tri< a ¬b ¬c = no ¬b | 207 is-o∅ x | tri< a ¬b ¬c = no ¬b |
184 is-o∅ x | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = yes b | 208 is-o∅ x | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = yes b |
185 is-o∅ x | tri> ¬a ¬b c = no ¬b | 209 is-o∅ x | tri> ¬a ¬b c = no ¬b |
186 | 210 |
187 _,_ : OD → OD → OD | 211 _,_ : HOD → HOD → HOD |
188 x , y = record { def = λ t → (t ≡ od→ord x ) ∨ ( t ≡ od→ord y ) } -- Ord (omax (od→ord x) (od→ord y)) | 212 x , y = record { od = record { def = λ t → (t ≡ od→ord x ) ∨ ( t ≡ od→ord y ) } ; odmax = omax (od→ord x) (od→ord y) ; <odmax = lemma } where |
213 lemma : {t : Ordinal} → (t ≡ od→ord x) ∨ (t ≡ od→ord y) → t o< omax (od→ord x) (od→ord y) | |
214 lemma {t} (case1 refl) = omax-x _ _ | |
215 lemma {t} (case2 refl) = omax-y _ _ | |
216 | |
189 | 217 |
190 -- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) | 218 -- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) |
191 -- postulate f-extensionality : { n : Level} → Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality.Extensionality n (suc n) | 219 -- postulate f-extensionality : { n : Level} → Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality.Extensionality n (suc n) |
192 | 220 |
193 in-codomain : (X : OD ) → ( ψ : OD → OD ) → OD | 221 in-codomain : (X : HOD ) → ( ψ : HOD → HOD ) → OD |
194 in-codomain X ψ = record { def = λ x → ¬ ( (y : Ordinal ) → ¬ ( def X y ∧ ( x ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y ))))) } | 222 in-codomain X ψ = record { def = λ x → ¬ ( (y : Ordinal ) → ¬ ( odef X y ∧ ( x ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y ))))) } |
195 | 223 |
196 -- Power Set of X ( or constructible by λ y → def X (od→ord y ) | 224 -- Power Set of X ( or constructible by λ y → odef X (od→ord y ) |
197 | 225 |
198 ZFSubset : (A x : OD ) → OD | 226 ZFSubset : (A x : HOD ) → HOD |
199 ZFSubset A x = record { def = λ y → def A y ∧ def x y } -- roughly x = A → Set | 227 ZFSubset A x = record { od = record { def = λ y → odef A y ∧ odef x y } ; odmax = omin (odmax A) (odmax x) ; <odmax = lemma } where -- roughly x = A → Set |
200 | 228 lemma : {y : Ordinal} → def (od A) y ∧ def (od x) y → y o< omin (odmax A) (odmax x) |
201 Def : (A : OD ) → OD | 229 lemma {y} and = min1 (<odmax A (proj1 and)) (<odmax x (proj2 and)) |
202 Def A = Ord ( sup-o ( λ x → od→ord ( ZFSubset A x) ) ) | 230 |
203 | 231 record _⊆_ ( A B : HOD ) : Set (suc n) where |
204 -- _⊆_ : ( A B : OD ) → ∀{ x : OD } → Set n | |
205 -- _⊆_ A B {x} = A ∋ x → B ∋ x | |
206 | |
207 record _⊆_ ( A B : OD ) : Set (suc n) where | |
208 field | 232 field |
209 incl : { x : OD } → A ∋ x → B ∋ x | 233 incl : { x : HOD } → A ∋ x → B ∋ x |
210 | 234 |
211 open _⊆_ | 235 open _⊆_ |
212 | |
213 infixr 220 _⊆_ | 236 infixr 220 _⊆_ |
214 | 237 |
215 subset-lemma : {A x : OD } → ( {y : OD } → x ∋ y → ZFSubset A x ∋ y ) ⇔ ( x ⊆ A ) | 238 subset-lemma : {A x : HOD } → ( {y : HOD } → x ∋ y → ZFSubset A x ∋ y ) ⇔ ( x ⊆ A ) |
216 subset-lemma {A} {x} = record { | 239 subset-lemma {A} {x} = record { |
217 proj1 = λ lt → record { incl = λ x∋z → proj1 (lt x∋z) } | 240 proj1 = λ lt → record { incl = λ x∋z → proj1 (lt x∋z) } |
218 ; proj2 = λ x⊆A lt → record { proj1 = incl x⊆A lt ; proj2 = lt } | 241 ; proj2 = λ x⊆A lt → record { proj1 = incl x⊆A lt ; proj2 = lt } |
219 } | 242 } |
220 | 243 |
244 od⊆→o≤ : {x y : HOD } → x ⊆ y → od→ord x o< osuc (od→ord y) | |
245 od⊆→o≤ {x} {y} lt = ⊆→o≤ {x} {y} (λ {z} x>z → subst (λ k → def (od y) k ) diso (incl lt (subst (λ k → def (od x) k ) (sym diso) x>z ))) | |
246 | |
247 power< : {A x : HOD } → x ⊆ A → Ord (osuc (od→ord A)) ∋ x | |
248 power< {A} {x} x⊆A = ⊆→o≤ (λ {y} x∋y → subst (λ k → def (od A) k) diso (lemma y x∋y ) ) where | |
249 lemma : (y : Ordinal) → def (od x) y → def (od A) (od→ord (ord→od y)) | |
250 lemma y x∋y = incl x⊆A (subst (λ k → def (od x) k ) (sym diso) x∋y ) | |
251 | |
221 open import Data.Unit | 252 open import Data.Unit |
222 | 253 |
223 ε-induction : { ψ : OD → Set (suc n)} | 254 ε-induction : { ψ : HOD → Set n} |
224 → ( {x : OD } → ({ y : OD } → x ∋ y → ψ y ) → ψ x ) | 255 → ( {x : HOD } → ({ y : HOD } → x ∋ y → ψ y ) → ψ x ) |
225 → (x : OD ) → ψ x | 256 → (x : HOD ) → ψ x |
226 ε-induction {ψ} ind x = subst (λ k → ψ k ) oiso (ε-induction-ord (osuc (od→ord x)) <-osuc ) where | 257 ε-induction {ψ} ind x = subst (λ k → ψ k ) oiso (ε-induction-ord (osuc (od→ord x)) <-osuc ) where |
227 induction : (ox : Ordinal) → ((oy : Ordinal) → oy o< ox → ψ (ord→od oy)) → ψ (ord→od ox) | 258 induction : (ox : Ordinal) → ((oy : Ordinal) → oy o< ox → ψ (ord→od oy)) → ψ (ord→od ox) |
228 induction ox prev = ind ( λ {y} lt → subst (λ k → ψ k ) oiso (prev (od→ord y) (o<-subst (c<→o< lt) refl diso ))) | 259 induction ox prev = ind ( λ {y} lt → subst (λ k → ψ k ) oiso (prev (od→ord y) (o<-subst (c<→o< lt) refl diso ))) |
229 ε-induction-ord : (ox : Ordinal) { oy : Ordinal } → oy o< ox → ψ (ord→od oy) | 260 ε-induction-ord : (ox : Ordinal) { oy : Ordinal } → oy o< ox → ψ (ord→od oy) |
230 ε-induction-ord ox {oy} lt = TransFinite {λ oy → ψ (ord→od oy)} induction oy | 261 ε-induction-ord ox {oy} lt = TransFinite {λ oy → ψ (ord→od oy)} induction oy |
231 | 262 |
232 -- minimal-2 : (x : OD ) → ( ne : ¬ (x == od∅ ) ) → (y : OD ) → ¬ ( def (minimal x ne) (od→ord y)) ∧ (def x (od→ord y) ) | 263 ε-induction1 : { ψ : HOD → Set (suc n)} |
233 -- minimal-2 x ne y = contra-position ( ε-induction (λ {z} ind → {!!} ) x ) ( λ p → {!!} ) | 264 → ( {x : HOD } → ({ y : HOD } → x ∋ y → ψ y ) → ψ x ) |
234 | 265 → (x : HOD ) → ψ x |
235 OD→ZF : ZF | 266 ε-induction1 {ψ} ind x = subst (λ k → ψ k ) oiso (ε-induction-ord (osuc (od→ord x)) <-osuc ) where |
236 OD→ZF = record { | 267 induction : (ox : Ordinal) → ((oy : Ordinal) → oy o< ox → ψ (ord→od oy)) → ψ (ord→od ox) |
237 ZFSet = OD | 268 induction ox prev = ind ( λ {y} lt → subst (λ k → ψ k ) oiso (prev (od→ord y) (o<-subst (c<→o< lt) refl diso ))) |
269 ε-induction-ord : (ox : Ordinal) { oy : Ordinal } → oy o< ox → ψ (ord→od oy) | |
270 ε-induction-ord ox {oy} lt = TransFinite1 {λ oy → ψ (ord→od oy)} induction oy | |
271 | |
272 HOD→ZF : ZF | |
273 HOD→ZF = record { | |
274 ZFSet = HOD | |
238 ; _∋_ = _∋_ | 275 ; _∋_ = _∋_ |
239 ; _≈_ = _==_ | 276 ; _≈_ = _=h=_ |
240 ; ∅ = od∅ | 277 ; ∅ = od∅ |
241 ; _,_ = _,_ | 278 ; _,_ = _,_ |
242 ; Union = Union | 279 ; Union = Union |
243 ; Power = Power | 280 ; Power = Power |
244 ; Select = Select | 281 ; Select = Select |
245 ; Replace = Replace | 282 ; Replace = Replace |
246 ; infinite = infinite | 283 ; infinite = infinite |
247 ; isZF = isZF | 284 ; isZF = isZF |
248 } where | 285 } where |
249 ZFSet = OD -- is less than Ords because of maxod | 286 ZFSet = HOD -- is less than Ords because of maxod |
250 Select : (X : OD ) → ((x : OD ) → Set n ) → OD | 287 Select : (X : HOD ) → ((x : HOD ) → Set n ) → HOD |
251 Select X ψ = record { def = λ x → ( def X x ∧ ψ ( ord→od x )) } | 288 Select X ψ = record { od = record { def = λ x → ( odef X x ∧ ψ ( ord→od x )) } ; odmax = odmax X ; <odmax = λ y → <odmax X (proj1 y) } |
252 Replace : OD → (OD → OD ) → OD | 289 Replace : HOD → (HOD → HOD) → HOD |
253 Replace X ψ = record { def = λ x → (x o< sup-o ( λ x → od→ord (ψ x))) ∧ def (in-codomain X ψ) x } | 290 Replace X ψ = record { od = record { def = λ x → (x o< sup-o X (λ y X∋y → od→ord (ψ (ord→od y)))) ∧ def (in-codomain X ψ) x } |
291 ; odmax = rmax ; <odmax = rmax<} where | |
292 rmax : Ordinal | |
293 rmax = sup-o X (λ y X∋y → od→ord (ψ (ord→od y))) | |
294 rmax< : {y : Ordinal} → (y o< rmax) ∧ def (in-codomain X ψ) y → y o< rmax | |
295 rmax< lt = proj1 lt | |
254 _∩_ : ( A B : ZFSet ) → ZFSet | 296 _∩_ : ( A B : ZFSet ) → ZFSet |
255 A ∩ B = record { def = λ x → def A x ∧ def B x } | 297 A ∩ B = record { od = record { def = λ x → odef A x ∧ odef B x } |
256 Union : OD → OD | 298 ; odmax = omin (odmax A) (odmax B) ; <odmax = λ y → min1 (<odmax A (proj1 y)) (<odmax B (proj2 y))} |
257 Union U = record { def = λ x → ¬ (∀ (u : Ordinal ) → ¬ ((def U u) ∧ (def (ord→od u) x))) } | 299 Union : HOD → HOD |
300 Union U = record { od = record { def = λ x → ¬ (∀ (u : Ordinal ) → ¬ ((odef U u) ∧ (odef (ord→od u) x))) } | |
301 ; odmax = osuc (od→ord U) ; <odmax = umax< } where | |
302 umax< : {y : Ordinal} → ¬ ((u : Ordinal) → ¬ def (od U) u ∧ def (od (ord→od u)) y) → y o< osuc (od→ord U) | |
303 umax< {y} not = lemma (FExists _ lemma1 not ) where | |
304 lemma0 : {x : Ordinal} → def (od (ord→od x)) y → y o< x | |
305 lemma0 {x} x<y = subst₂ (λ j k → j o< k ) diso diso (c<→o< (subst (λ k → def (od (ord→od x)) k) (sym diso) x<y)) | |
306 lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → def (od U) x → x o< od→ord U | |
307 lemma2 {x} x<U = subst (λ k → k o< od→ord U ) diso (c<→o< (subst (λ k → def (od U) k) (sym diso) x<U)) | |
308 lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → def (od U) x ∧ def (od (ord→od x)) y → ¬ (od→ord U o< y) | |
309 lemma1 {x} lt u<y = o<> u<y (ordtrans (lemma0 (proj2 lt)) (lemma2 (proj1 lt)) ) | |
310 lemma : ¬ ((od→ord U) o< y ) → y o< osuc (od→ord U) | |
311 lemma not with trio< y (od→ord U) | |
312 lemma not | tri< a ¬b ¬c = ordtrans a <-osuc | |
313 lemma not | tri≈ ¬a refl ¬c = <-osuc | |
314 lemma not | tri> ¬a ¬b c = ⊥-elim (not c) | |
258 _∈_ : ( A B : ZFSet ) → Set n | 315 _∈_ : ( A B : ZFSet ) → Set n |
259 A ∈ B = B ∋ A | 316 A ∈ B = B ∋ A |
260 Power : OD → OD | 317 |
261 Power A = Replace (Def (Ord (od→ord A))) ( λ x → A ∩ x ) | 318 OPwr : (A : HOD ) → HOD |
319 OPwr A = Ord ( sup-o (Ord (osuc (od→ord A))) ( λ x A∋x → od→ord ( ZFSubset A (ord→od x)) ) ) | |
320 | |
321 Power : HOD → HOD | |
322 Power A = Replace (OPwr (Ord (od→ord A))) ( λ x → A ∩ x ) | |
262 -- {_} : ZFSet → ZFSet | 323 -- {_} : ZFSet → ZFSet |
263 -- { x } = ( x , x ) -- it works but we don't use | 324 -- { x } = ( x , x ) -- it works but we don't use |
264 | 325 |
265 data infinite-d : ( x : Ordinal ) → Set n where | 326 data infinite-d : ( x : Ordinal ) → Set n where |
266 iφ : infinite-d o∅ | 327 iφ : infinite-d o∅ |
267 isuc : {x : Ordinal } → infinite-d x → | 328 isuc : {x : Ordinal } → infinite-d x → |
268 infinite-d (od→ord ( Union (ord→od x , (ord→od x , ord→od x ) ) )) | 329 infinite-d (od→ord ( Union (ord→od x , (ord→od x , ord→od x ) ) )) |
269 | 330 |
270 infinite : OD | 331 -- ω can be diverged in our case, since we have no restriction on the corresponding ordinal of a pair. |
271 infinite = record { def = λ x → infinite-d x } | 332 -- We simply assumes nfinite-d y has a maximum. |
333 -- | |
334 -- This means that many of OD cannot be HODs because of the od→ord mapping divergence. | |
335 -- We should have some axioms to prevent this, but it may complicate thins. | |
336 -- | |
337 postulate | |
338 ωmax : Ordinal | |
339 <ωmax : {y : Ordinal} → infinite-d y → y o< ωmax | |
340 | |
341 infinite : HOD | |
342 infinite = record { od = record { def = λ x → infinite-d x } ; odmax = ωmax ; <odmax = <ωmax } | |
343 | |
344 _=h=_ : (x y : HOD) → Set n | |
345 x =h= y = od x == od y | |
272 | 346 |
273 infixr 200 _∈_ | 347 infixr 200 _∈_ |
274 -- infixr 230 _∩_ _∪_ | 348 -- infixr 230 _∩_ _∪_ |
275 isZF : IsZF (OD ) _∋_ _==_ od∅ _,_ Union Power Select Replace infinite | 349 isZF : IsZF (HOD ) _∋_ _=h=_ od∅ _,_ Union Power Select Replace infinite |
276 isZF = record { | 350 isZF = record { |
277 isEquivalence = record { refl = ==-refl ; sym = ==-sym; trans = ==-trans } | 351 isEquivalence = record { refl = ==-refl ; sym = ==-sym; trans = ==-trans } |
278 ; pair→ = pair→ | 352 ; pair→ = pair→ |
279 ; pair← = pair← | 353 ; pair← = pair← |
280 ; union→ = union→ | 354 ; union→ = union→ |
286 ; ε-induction = ε-induction | 360 ; ε-induction = ε-induction |
287 ; infinity∅ = infinity∅ | 361 ; infinity∅ = infinity∅ |
288 ; infinity = infinity | 362 ; infinity = infinity |
289 ; selection = λ {X} {ψ} {y} → selection {X} {ψ} {y} | 363 ; selection = λ {X} {ψ} {y} → selection {X} {ψ} {y} |
290 ; replacement← = replacement← | 364 ; replacement← = replacement← |
291 ; replacement→ = replacement→ | 365 ; replacement→ = λ {ψ} → replacement→ {ψ} |
292 -- ; choice-func = choice-func | 366 -- ; choice-func = choice-func |
293 -- ; choice = choice | 367 -- ; choice = choice |
294 } where | 368 } where |
295 | 369 |
296 pair→ : ( x y t : ZFSet ) → (x , y) ∋ t → ( t == x ) ∨ ( t == y ) | 370 pair→ : ( x y t : ZFSet ) → (x , y) ∋ t → ( t =h= x ) ∨ ( t =h= y ) |
297 pair→ x y t (case1 t≡x ) = case1 (subst₂ (λ j k → j == k ) oiso oiso (o≡→== t≡x )) | 371 pair→ x y t (case1 t≡x ) = case1 (subst₂ (λ j k → j =h= k ) oiso oiso (o≡→== t≡x )) |
298 pair→ x y t (case2 t≡y ) = case2 (subst₂ (λ j k → j == k ) oiso oiso (o≡→== t≡y )) | 372 pair→ x y t (case2 t≡y ) = case2 (subst₂ (λ j k → j =h= k ) oiso oiso (o≡→== t≡y )) |
299 | 373 |
300 pair← : ( x y t : ZFSet ) → ( t == x ) ∨ ( t == y ) → (x , y) ∋ t | 374 pair← : ( x y t : ZFSet ) → ( t =h= x ) ∨ ( t =h= y ) → (x , y) ∋ t |
301 pair← x y t (case1 t==x) = case1 (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ t==x)) | 375 pair← x y t (case1 t=h=x) = case1 (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ t=h=x)) |
302 pair← x y t (case2 t==y) = case2 (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ t==y)) | 376 pair← x y t (case2 t=h=y) = case2 (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ t=h=y)) |
303 | 377 |
304 empty : (x : OD ) → ¬ (od∅ ∋ x) | 378 empty : (x : HOD ) → ¬ (od∅ ∋ x) |
305 empty x = ¬x<0 | 379 empty x = ¬x<0 |
306 | 380 |
307 o<→c< : {x y : Ordinal } → x o< y → (Ord x) ⊆ (Ord y) | 381 o<→c< : {x y : Ordinal } → x o< y → (Ord x) ⊆ (Ord y) |
308 o<→c< lt = record { incl = λ z → ordtrans z lt } | 382 o<→c< lt = record { incl = λ z → ordtrans z lt } |
309 | 383 |
312 ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri< a ¬b ¬c = ordtrans a <-osuc | 386 ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri< a ¬b ¬c = ordtrans a <-osuc |
313 ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = subst ( λ k → k o< osuc y) (sym b) <-osuc | 387 ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = subst ( λ k → k o< osuc y) (sym b) <-osuc |
314 ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri> ¬a ¬b c with (incl lt) (o<-subst c (sym diso) refl ) | 388 ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri> ¬a ¬b c with (incl lt) (o<-subst c (sym diso) refl ) |
315 ... | ttt = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ refl (o<-subst ttt diso refl )) | 389 ... | ttt = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ refl (o<-subst ttt diso refl )) |
316 | 390 |
317 union→ : (X z u : OD) → (X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z) → Union X ∋ z | 391 union→ : (X z u : HOD) → (X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z) → Union X ∋ z |
318 union→ X z u xx not = ⊥-elim ( not (od→ord u) ( record { proj1 = proj1 xx | 392 union→ X z u xx not = ⊥-elim ( not (od→ord u) ( record { proj1 = proj1 xx |
319 ; proj2 = subst ( λ k → def k (od→ord z)) (sym oiso) (proj2 xx) } )) | 393 ; proj2 = subst ( λ k → odef k (od→ord z)) (sym oiso) (proj2 xx) } )) |
320 union← : (X z : OD) (X∋z : Union X ∋ z) → ¬ ( (u : OD ) → ¬ ((X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z ))) | 394 union← : (X z : HOD) (X∋z : Union X ∋ z) → ¬ ( (u : HOD ) → ¬ ((X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z ))) |
321 union← X z UX∋z = FExists _ lemma UX∋z where | 395 union← X z UX∋z = FExists _ lemma UX∋z where |
322 lemma : {y : Ordinal} → def X y ∧ def (ord→od y) (od→ord z) → ¬ ((u : OD) → ¬ (X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z)) | 396 lemma : {y : Ordinal} → odef X y ∧ odef (ord→od y) (od→ord z) → ¬ ((u : HOD) → ¬ (X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z)) |
323 lemma {y} xx not = not (ord→od y) record { proj1 = subst ( λ k → def X k ) (sym diso) (proj1 xx ) ; proj2 = proj2 xx } | 397 lemma {y} xx not = not (ord→od y) record { proj1 = subst ( λ k → odef X k ) (sym diso) (proj1 xx ) ; proj2 = proj2 xx } |
324 | 398 |
325 ψiso : {ψ : OD → Set n} {x y : OD } → ψ x → x ≡ y → ψ y | 399 ψiso : {ψ : HOD → Set n} {x y : HOD } → ψ x → x ≡ y → ψ y |
326 ψiso {ψ} t refl = t | 400 ψiso {ψ} t refl = t |
327 selection : {ψ : OD → Set n} {X y : OD} → ((X ∋ y) ∧ ψ y) ⇔ (Select X ψ ∋ y) | 401 selection : {ψ : HOD → Set n} {X y : HOD} → ((X ∋ y) ∧ ψ y) ⇔ (Select X ψ ∋ y) |
328 selection {ψ} {X} {y} = record { | 402 selection {ψ} {X} {y} = record { |
329 proj1 = λ cond → record { proj1 = proj1 cond ; proj2 = ψiso {ψ} (proj2 cond) (sym oiso) } | 403 proj1 = λ cond → record { proj1 = proj1 cond ; proj2 = ψiso {ψ} (proj2 cond) (sym oiso) } |
330 ; proj2 = λ select → record { proj1 = proj1 select ; proj2 = ψiso {ψ} (proj2 select) oiso } | 404 ; proj2 = λ select → record { proj1 = proj1 select ; proj2 = ψiso {ψ} (proj2 select) oiso } |
331 } | 405 } |
332 replacement← : {ψ : OD → OD} (X x : OD) → X ∋ x → Replace X ψ ∋ ψ x | 406 sup-c< : (ψ : HOD → HOD) → {X x : HOD} → X ∋ x → od→ord (ψ x) o< (sup-o X (λ y X∋y → od→ord (ψ (ord→od y)))) |
333 replacement← {ψ} X x lt = record { proj1 = sup-c< ψ {x} ; proj2 = lemma } where | 407 sup-c< ψ {X} {x} lt = subst (λ k → od→ord (ψ k) o< _ ) oiso (sup-o< X lt ) |
408 replacement← : {ψ : HOD → HOD} (X x : HOD) → X ∋ x → Replace X ψ ∋ ψ x | |
409 replacement← {ψ} X x lt = record { proj1 = sup-c< ψ {X} {x} lt ; proj2 = lemma } where | |
334 lemma : def (in-codomain X ψ) (od→ord (ψ x)) | 410 lemma : def (in-codomain X ψ) (od→ord (ψ x)) |
335 lemma not = ⊥-elim ( not ( od→ord x ) (record { proj1 = lt ; proj2 = cong (λ k → od→ord (ψ k)) (sym oiso)} )) | 411 lemma not = ⊥-elim ( not ( od→ord x ) (record { proj1 = lt ; proj2 = cong (λ k → od→ord (ψ k)) (sym oiso)} )) |
336 replacement→ : {ψ : OD → OD} (X x : OD) → (lt : Replace X ψ ∋ x) → ¬ ( (y : OD) → ¬ (x == ψ y)) | 412 replacement→ : {ψ : HOD → HOD} (X x : HOD) → (lt : Replace X ψ ∋ x) → ¬ ( (y : HOD) → ¬ (x =h= ψ y)) |
337 replacement→ {ψ} X x lt = contra-position lemma (lemma2 (proj2 lt)) where | 413 replacement→ {ψ} X x lt = contra-position lemma (lemma2 (proj2 lt)) where |
338 lemma2 : ¬ ((y : Ordinal) → ¬ def X y ∧ ((od→ord x) ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y)))) | 414 lemma2 : ¬ ((y : Ordinal) → ¬ odef X y ∧ ((od→ord x) ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y)))) |
339 → ¬ ((y : Ordinal) → ¬ def X y ∧ (ord→od (od→ord x) == ψ (ord→od y))) | 415 → ¬ ((y : Ordinal) → ¬ odef X y ∧ (ord→od (od→ord x) =h= ψ (ord→od y))) |
340 lemma2 not not2 = not ( λ y d → not2 y (record { proj1 = proj1 d ; proj2 = lemma3 (proj2 d)})) where | 416 lemma2 not not2 = not ( λ y d → not2 y (record { proj1 = proj1 d ; proj2 = lemma3 (proj2 d)})) where |
341 lemma3 : {y : Ordinal } → (od→ord x ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y))) → (ord→od (od→ord x) == ψ (ord→od y)) | 417 lemma3 : {y : Ordinal } → (od→ord x ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y))) → (ord→od (od→ord x) =h= ψ (ord→od y)) |
342 lemma3 {y} eq = subst (λ k → ord→od (od→ord x) == k ) oiso (o≡→== eq ) | 418 lemma3 {y} eq = subst (λ k → ord→od (od→ord x) =h= k ) oiso (o≡→== eq ) |
343 lemma : ( (y : OD) → ¬ (x == ψ y)) → ( (y : Ordinal) → ¬ def X y ∧ (ord→od (od→ord x) == ψ (ord→od y)) ) | 419 lemma : ( (y : HOD) → ¬ (x =h= ψ y)) → ( (y : Ordinal) → ¬ odef X y ∧ (ord→od (od→ord x) =h= ψ (ord→od y)) ) |
344 lemma not y not2 = not (ord→od y) (subst (λ k → k == ψ (ord→od y)) oiso ( proj2 not2 )) | 420 lemma not y not2 = not (ord→od y) (subst (λ k → k =h= ψ (ord→od y)) oiso ( proj2 not2 )) |
345 | 421 |
346 --- | 422 --- |
347 --- Power Set | 423 --- Power Set |
348 --- | 424 --- |
349 --- First consider ordinals in OD | 425 --- First consider ordinals in HOD |
350 --- | 426 --- |
351 --- ZFSubset A x = record { def = λ y → def A y ∧ def x y } subset of A | 427 --- ZFSubset A x = record { def = λ y → odef A y ∧ odef x y } subset of A |
352 -- | 428 -- |
353 -- | 429 -- |
354 ∩-≡ : { a b : OD } → ({x : OD } → (a ∋ x → b ∋ x)) → a == ( b ∩ a ) | 430 ∩-≡ : { a b : HOD } → ({x : HOD } → (a ∋ x → b ∋ x)) → a =h= ( b ∩ a ) |
355 ∩-≡ {a} {b} inc = record { | 431 ∩-≡ {a} {b} inc = record { |
356 eq→ = λ {x} x<a → record { proj2 = x<a ; | 432 eq→ = λ {x} x<a → record { proj2 = x<a ; |
357 proj1 = def-subst {_} {_} {b} {x} (inc (def-subst {_} {_} {a} {_} x<a refl (sym diso) )) refl diso } ; | 433 proj1 = odef-subst {_} {_} {b} {x} (inc (odef-subst {_} {_} {a} {_} x<a refl (sym diso) )) refl diso } ; |
358 eq← = λ {x} x<a∩b → proj2 x<a∩b } | 434 eq← = λ {x} x<a∩b → proj2 x<a∩b } |
359 -- | 435 -- |
360 -- Transitive Set case | 436 -- Transitive Set case |
361 -- we have t ∋ x → Ord a ∋ x means t is a subset of Ord a, that is ZFSubset (Ord a) t == t | 437 -- we have t ∋ x → Ord a ∋ x means t is a subset of Ord a, that is ZFSubset (Ord a) t =h= t |
362 -- Def (Ord a) is a sup of ZFSubset (Ord a) t, so Def (Ord a) ∋ t | 438 -- OPwr (Ord a) is a sup of ZFSubset (Ord a) t, so OPwr (Ord a) ∋ t |
363 -- Def A = Ord ( sup-o ( λ x → od→ord ( ZFSubset A (ord→od x )) ) ) | 439 -- OPwr A = Ord ( sup-o ( λ x → od→ord ( ZFSubset A (ord→od x )) ) ) |
364 -- | 440 -- |
365 ord-power← : (a : Ordinal ) (t : OD) → ({x : OD} → (t ∋ x → (Ord a) ∋ x)) → Def (Ord a) ∋ t | 441 ord-power← : (a : Ordinal ) (t : HOD) → ({x : HOD} → (t ∋ x → (Ord a) ∋ x)) → OPwr (Ord a) ∋ t |
366 ord-power← a t t→A = def-subst {_} {_} {Def (Ord a)} {od→ord t} | 442 ord-power← a t t→A = odef-subst {_} {_} {OPwr (Ord a)} {od→ord t} |
367 lemma refl (lemma1 lemma-eq )where | 443 lemma refl (lemma1 lemma-eq )where |
368 lemma-eq : ZFSubset (Ord a) t == t | 444 lemma-eq : ZFSubset (Ord a) t =h= t |
369 eq→ lemma-eq {z} w = proj2 w | 445 eq→ lemma-eq {z} w = proj2 w |
370 eq← lemma-eq {z} w = record { proj2 = w ; | 446 eq← lemma-eq {z} w = record { proj2 = w ; |
371 proj1 = def-subst {_} {_} {(Ord a)} {z} | 447 proj1 = odef-subst {_} {_} {(Ord a)} {z} |
372 ( t→A (def-subst {_} {_} {t} {od→ord (ord→od z)} w refl (sym diso) )) refl diso } | 448 ( t→A (odef-subst {_} {_} {t} {od→ord (ord→od z)} w refl (sym diso) )) refl diso } |
373 lemma1 : {a : Ordinal } { t : OD } | 449 lemma1 : {a : Ordinal } { t : HOD } |
374 → (eq : ZFSubset (Ord a) t == t) → od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord a) (ord→od (od→ord t))) ≡ od→ord t | 450 → (eq : ZFSubset (Ord a) t =h= t) → od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord a) (ord→od (od→ord t))) ≡ od→ord t |
375 lemma1 {a} {t} eq = subst (λ k → od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord a) k) ≡ od→ord t ) (sym oiso) (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ eq )) | 451 lemma1 {a} {t} eq = subst (λ k → od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord a) k) ≡ od→ord t ) (sym oiso) (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ eq )) |
376 lemma : od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord a) (ord→od (od→ord t)) ) o< sup-o (λ x → od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord a) x)) | 452 lemma2 : (od→ord t) o< (osuc (od→ord (Ord a))) |
377 lemma = sup-o< | 453 lemma2 = ⊆→o≤ {t} {Ord a} (λ {x} x<t → subst (λ k → def (od (Ord a)) k) diso (t→A (subst (λ k → def (od t) k) (sym diso) x<t))) |
454 lemma : od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord a) (ord→od (od→ord t)) ) o< sup-o (Ord (osuc (od→ord (Ord a)))) (λ x lt → od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord a) (ord→od x))) | |
455 lemma = sup-o< _ lemma2 | |
378 | 456 |
379 -- | 457 -- |
380 -- Every set in OD is a subset of Ordinals, so make Def (Ord (od→ord A)) first | 458 -- Every set in HOD is a subset of Ordinals, so make OPwr (Ord (od→ord A)) first |
381 -- then replace of all elements of the Power set by A ∩ y | 459 -- then replace of all elements of the Power set by A ∩ y |
382 -- | 460 -- |
383 -- Power A = Replace (Def (Ord (od→ord A))) ( λ y → A ∩ y ) | 461 -- Power A = Replace (OPwr (Ord (od→ord A))) ( λ y → A ∩ y ) |
384 | 462 |
385 -- we have oly double negation form because of the replacement axiom | 463 -- we have oly double negation form because of the replacement axiom |
386 -- | 464 -- |
387 power→ : ( A t : OD) → Power A ∋ t → {x : OD} → t ∋ x → ¬ ¬ (A ∋ x) | 465 power→ : ( A t : HOD) → Power A ∋ t → {x : HOD} → t ∋ x → ¬ ¬ (A ∋ x) |
388 power→ A t P∋t {x} t∋x = FExists _ lemma5 lemma4 where | 466 power→ A t P∋t {x} t∋x = FExists _ lemma5 lemma4 where |
389 a = od→ord A | 467 a = od→ord A |
390 lemma2 : ¬ ( (y : OD) → ¬ (t == (A ∩ y))) | 468 lemma2 : ¬ ( (y : HOD) → ¬ (t =h= (A ∩ y))) |
391 lemma2 = replacement→ (Def (Ord (od→ord A))) t P∋t | 469 lemma2 = replacement→ {λ x → A ∩ x} (OPwr (Ord (od→ord A))) t P∋t |
392 lemma3 : (y : OD) → t == ( A ∩ y ) → ¬ ¬ (A ∋ x) | 470 lemma3 : (y : HOD) → t =h= ( A ∩ y ) → ¬ ¬ (A ∋ x) |
393 lemma3 y eq not = not (proj1 (eq→ eq t∋x)) | 471 lemma3 y eq not = not (proj1 (eq→ eq t∋x)) |
394 lemma4 : ¬ ((y : Ordinal) → ¬ (t == (A ∩ ord→od y))) | 472 lemma4 : ¬ ((y : Ordinal) → ¬ (t =h= (A ∩ ord→od y))) |
395 lemma4 not = lemma2 ( λ y not1 → not (od→ord y) (subst (λ k → t == ( A ∩ k )) (sym oiso) not1 )) | 473 lemma4 not = lemma2 ( λ y not1 → not (od→ord y) (subst (λ k → t =h= ( A ∩ k )) (sym oiso) not1 )) |
396 lemma5 : {y : Ordinal} → t == (A ∩ ord→od y) → ¬ ¬ (def A (od→ord x)) | 474 lemma5 : {y : Ordinal} → t =h= (A ∩ ord→od y) → ¬ ¬ (odef A (od→ord x)) |
397 lemma5 {y} eq not = (lemma3 (ord→od y) eq) not | 475 lemma5 {y} eq not = (lemma3 (ord→od y) eq) not |
398 | 476 |
399 power← : (A t : OD) → ({x : OD} → (t ∋ x → A ∋ x)) → Power A ∋ t | 477 power← : (A t : HOD) → ({x : HOD} → (t ∋ x → A ∋ x)) → Power A ∋ t |
400 power← A t t→A = record { proj1 = lemma1 ; proj2 = lemma2 } where | 478 power← A t t→A = record { proj1 = lemma1 ; proj2 = lemma2 } where |
401 a = od→ord A | 479 a = od→ord A |
402 lemma0 : {x : OD} → t ∋ x → Ord a ∋ x | 480 lemma0 : {x : HOD} → t ∋ x → Ord a ∋ x |
403 lemma0 {x} t∋x = c<→o< (t→A t∋x) | 481 lemma0 {x} t∋x = c<→o< (t→A t∋x) |
404 lemma3 : Def (Ord a) ∋ t | 482 lemma3 : OPwr (Ord a) ∋ t |
405 lemma3 = ord-power← a t lemma0 | 483 lemma3 = ord-power← a t lemma0 |
406 lemma4 : (A ∩ ord→od (od→ord t)) ≡ t | 484 lemma4 : (A ∩ ord→od (od→ord t)) ≡ t |
407 lemma4 = let open ≡-Reasoning in begin | 485 lemma4 = let open ≡-Reasoning in begin |
408 A ∩ ord→od (od→ord t) | 486 A ∩ ord→od (od→ord t) |
409 ≡⟨ cong (λ k → A ∩ k) oiso ⟩ | 487 ≡⟨ cong (λ k → A ∩ k) oiso ⟩ |
410 A ∩ t | 488 A ∩ t |
411 ≡⟨ sym (==→o≡ ( ∩-≡ t→A )) ⟩ | 489 ≡⟨ sym (==→o≡ ( ∩-≡ {t} {A} t→A )) ⟩ |
412 t | 490 t |
413 ∎ | 491 ∎ |
414 lemma1 : od→ord t o< sup-o (λ x → od→ord (A ∩ x)) | 492 sup1 : Ordinal |
415 lemma1 = subst (λ k → od→ord k o< sup-o (λ x → od→ord (A ∩ x))) | 493 sup1 = sup-o (Ord (osuc (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A))))) (λ x A∋x → od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord (od→ord A)) (ord→od x))) |
416 lemma4 (sup-o< {λ x → od→ord (A ∩ x)} ) | 494 lemma9 : def (od (Ord (Ordinals.osuc O (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)))))) (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A))) |
417 lemma2 : def (in-codomain (Def (Ord (od→ord A))) (_∩_ A)) (od→ord t) | 495 lemma9 = <-osuc |
496 lemmab : od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord (od→ord A)) (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A) )))) o< sup1 | |
497 lemmab = sup-o< (Ord (osuc (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A))))) lemma9 | |
498 lemmad : Ord (osuc (od→ord A)) ∋ t | |
499 lemmad = ⊆→o≤ (λ {x} lt → subst (λ k → def (od A) k ) diso (t→A (subst (λ k → def (od t) k ) (sym diso) lt))) | |
500 lemmac : ZFSubset (Ord (od→ord A)) (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A) ))) =h= Ord (od→ord A) | |
501 lemmac = record { eq→ = lemmaf ; eq← = lemmag } where | |
502 lemmaf : {x : Ordinal} → def (od (ZFSubset (Ord (od→ord A)) (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)))))) x → def (od (Ord (od→ord A))) x | |
503 lemmaf {x} lt = proj1 lt | |
504 lemmag : {x : Ordinal} → def (od (Ord (od→ord A))) x → def (od (ZFSubset (Ord (od→ord A)) (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)))))) x | |
505 lemmag {x} lt = record { proj1 = lt ; proj2 = subst (λ k → def (od k) x) (sym oiso) lt } | |
506 lemmae : od→ord (ZFSubset (Ord (od→ord A)) (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord A))))) ≡ od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)) | |
507 lemmae = cong (λ k → od→ord k ) ( ==→o≡ lemmac) | |
508 lemma7 : def (od (OPwr (Ord (od→ord A)))) (od→ord t) | |
509 lemma7 with osuc-≡< lemmad | |
510 lemma7 | case2 lt = ordtrans (c<→o< lt) (subst (λ k → k o< sup1) lemmae lemmab ) | |
511 lemma7 | case1 eq with osuc-≡< (⊆→o≤ {ord→od (od→ord t)} {ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord t)))} (λ {x} lt → lemmah lt )) where | |
512 lemmah : {x : Ordinal } → def (od (ord→od (od→ord t))) x → def (od (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord t))))) x | |
513 lemmah {x} lt = subst (λ k → def (od k) x ) (sym oiso) (subst (λ k → k o< (od→ord t)) | |
514 diso | |
515 (c<→o< (subst₂ (λ j k → def (od j) k) oiso (sym diso) lt ))) | |
516 lemma7 | case1 eq | case1 eq1 = subst (λ k → k o< sup1) (trans lemmae lemmai) lemmab where | |
517 lemmai : od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)) ≡ od→ord t | |
518 lemmai = let open ≡-Reasoning in begin | |
519 od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)) | |
520 ≡⟨ sym (cong (λ k → od→ord (Ord k)) eq) ⟩ | |
521 od→ord (Ord (od→ord t)) | |
522 ≡⟨ sym diso ⟩ | |
523 od→ord (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord t)))) | |
524 ≡⟨ sym eq1 ⟩ | |
525 od→ord (ord→od (od→ord t)) | |
526 ≡⟨ diso ⟩ | |
527 od→ord t | |
528 ∎ | |
529 lemma7 | case1 eq | case2 lt = ordtrans lemmaj (subst (λ k → k o< sup1) lemmae lemmab ) where | |
530 lemmak : od→ord (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord t)))) ≡ od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)) | |
531 lemmak = let open ≡-Reasoning in begin | |
532 od→ord (ord→od (od→ord (Ord (od→ord t)))) | |
533 ≡⟨ diso ⟩ | |
534 od→ord (Ord (od→ord t)) | |
535 ≡⟨ cong (λ k → od→ord (Ord k)) eq ⟩ | |
536 od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)) | |
537 ∎ | |
538 lemmaj : od→ord t o< od→ord (Ord (od→ord A)) | |
539 lemmaj = subst₂ (λ j k → j o< k ) diso lemmak lt | |
540 lemma1 : od→ord t o< sup-o (OPwr (Ord (od→ord A))) (λ x lt → od→ord (A ∩ (ord→od x))) | |
541 lemma1 = subst (λ k → od→ord k o< sup-o (OPwr (Ord (od→ord A))) (λ x lt → od→ord (A ∩ (ord→od x)))) | |
542 lemma4 (sup-o< (OPwr (Ord (od→ord A))) lemma7 ) | |
543 lemma2 : def (in-codomain (OPwr (Ord (od→ord A))) (_∩_ A)) (od→ord t) | |
418 lemma2 not = ⊥-elim ( not (od→ord t) (record { proj1 = lemma3 ; proj2 = lemma6 }) ) where | 544 lemma2 not = ⊥-elim ( not (od→ord t) (record { proj1 = lemma3 ; proj2 = lemma6 }) ) where |
419 lemma6 : od→ord t ≡ od→ord (A ∩ ord→od (od→ord t)) | 545 lemma6 : od→ord t ≡ od→ord (A ∩ ord→od (od→ord t)) |
420 lemma6 = cong ( λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ (subst (λ k → t == (A ∩ k)) (sym oiso) ( ∩-≡ t→A ))) | 546 lemma6 = cong ( λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ (subst (λ k → t =h= (A ∩ k)) (sym oiso) ( ∩-≡ {t} {A} t→A ))) |
547 | |
421 | 548 |
422 ord⊆power : (a : Ordinal) → (Ord (osuc a)) ⊆ (Power (Ord a)) | 549 ord⊆power : (a : Ordinal) → (Ord (osuc a)) ⊆ (Power (Ord a)) |
423 ord⊆power a = record { incl = λ {x} lt → power← (Ord a) x (lemma lt) } where | 550 ord⊆power a = record { incl = λ {x} lt → power← (Ord a) x (lemma lt) } where |
424 lemma : {x y : OD} → od→ord x o< osuc a → x ∋ y → Ord a ∋ y | 551 lemma : {x y : HOD} → od→ord x o< osuc a → x ∋ y → Ord a ∋ y |
425 lemma lt y<x with osuc-≡< lt | 552 lemma lt y<x with osuc-≡< lt |
426 lemma lt y<x | case1 refl = c<→o< y<x | 553 lemma lt y<x | case1 refl = c<→o< y<x |
427 lemma lt y<x | case2 x<a = ordtrans (c<→o< y<x) x<a | 554 lemma lt y<x | case2 x<a = ordtrans (c<→o< y<x) x<a |
428 | 555 |
429 continuum-hyphotheis : (a : Ordinal) → Set (suc n) | 556 continuum-hyphotheis : (a : Ordinal) → Set (suc n) |
430 continuum-hyphotheis a = Power (Ord a) ⊆ Ord (osuc a) | 557 continuum-hyphotheis a = Power (Ord a) ⊆ Ord (osuc a) |
431 | 558 |
432 extensionality0 : {A B : OD } → ((z : OD) → (A ∋ z) ⇔ (B ∋ z)) → A == B | 559 extensionality0 : {A B : HOD } → ((z : HOD) → (A ∋ z) ⇔ (B ∋ z)) → A =h= B |
433 eq→ (extensionality0 {A} {B} eq ) {x} d = def-iso {A} {B} (sym diso) (proj1 (eq (ord→od x))) d | 560 eq→ (extensionality0 {A} {B} eq ) {x} d = odef-iso {A} {B} (sym diso) (proj1 (eq (ord→od x))) d |
434 eq← (extensionality0 {A} {B} eq ) {x} d = def-iso {B} {A} (sym diso) (proj2 (eq (ord→od x))) d | 561 eq← (extensionality0 {A} {B} eq ) {x} d = odef-iso {B} {A} (sym diso) (proj2 (eq (ord→od x))) d |
435 | 562 |
436 extensionality : {A B w : OD } → ((z : OD ) → (A ∋ z) ⇔ (B ∋ z)) → (w ∋ A) ⇔ (w ∋ B) | 563 extensionality : {A B w : HOD } → ((z : HOD ) → (A ∋ z) ⇔ (B ∋ z)) → (w ∋ A) ⇔ (w ∋ B) |
437 proj1 (extensionality {A} {B} {w} eq ) d = subst (λ k → w ∋ k) ( ==→o≡ (extensionality0 {A} {B} eq) ) d | 564 proj1 (extensionality {A} {B} {w} eq ) d = subst (λ k → w ∋ k) ( ==→o≡ (extensionality0 {A} {B} eq) ) d |
438 proj2 (extensionality {A} {B} {w} eq ) d = subst (λ k → w ∋ k) (sym ( ==→o≡ (extensionality0 {A} {B} eq) )) d | 565 proj2 (extensionality {A} {B} {w} eq ) d = subst (λ k → w ∋ k) (sym ( ==→o≡ (extensionality0 {A} {B} eq) )) d |
439 | 566 |
440 infinity∅ : infinite ∋ od∅ | 567 infinity∅ : infinite ∋ od∅ |
441 infinity∅ = def-subst {_} {_} {infinite} {od→ord (od∅ )} iφ refl lemma where | 568 infinity∅ = odef-subst {_} {_} {infinite} {od→ord (od∅ )} iφ refl lemma where |
442 lemma : o∅ ≡ od→ord od∅ | 569 lemma : o∅ ≡ od→ord od∅ |
443 lemma = let open ≡-Reasoning in begin | 570 lemma = let open ≡-Reasoning in begin |
444 o∅ | 571 o∅ |
445 ≡⟨ sym diso ⟩ | 572 ≡⟨ sym diso ⟩ |
446 od→ord ( ord→od o∅ ) | 573 od→ord ( ord→od o∅ ) |
447 ≡⟨ cong ( λ k → od→ord k ) o∅≡od∅ ⟩ | 574 ≡⟨ cong ( λ k → od→ord k ) o∅≡od∅ ⟩ |
448 od→ord od∅ | 575 od→ord od∅ |
449 ∎ | 576 ∎ |
450 infinity : (x : OD) → infinite ∋ x → infinite ∋ Union (x , (x , x )) | 577 infinity : (x : HOD) → infinite ∋ x → infinite ∋ Union (x , (x , x )) |
451 infinity x lt = def-subst {_} {_} {infinite} {od→ord (Union (x , (x , x )))} ( isuc {od→ord x} lt ) refl lemma where | 578 infinity x lt = odef-subst {_} {_} {infinite} {od→ord (Union (x , (x , x )))} ( isuc {od→ord x} lt ) refl lemma where |
452 lemma : od→ord (Union (ord→od (od→ord x) , (ord→od (od→ord x) , ord→od (od→ord x)))) | 579 lemma : od→ord (Union (ord→od (od→ord x) , (ord→od (od→ord x) , ord→od (od→ord x)))) |
453 ≡ od→ord (Union (x , (x , x))) | 580 ≡ od→ord (Union (x , (x , x))) |
454 lemma = cong (λ k → od→ord (Union ( k , ( k , k ) ))) oiso | 581 lemma = cong (λ k → od→ord (Union ( k , ( k , k ) ))) oiso |
455 | 582 |
456 | 583 |
457 Union = ZF.Union OD→ZF | 584 Union = ZF.Union HOD→ZF |
458 Power = ZF.Power OD→ZF | 585 Power = ZF.Power HOD→ZF |
459 Select = ZF.Select OD→ZF | 586 Select = ZF.Select HOD→ZF |
460 Replace = ZF.Replace OD→ZF | 587 Replace = ZF.Replace HOD→ZF |
461 isZF = ZF.isZF OD→ZF | 588 isZF = ZF.isZF HOD→ZF |