Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > ZF-in-agda
diff ordinal.agda @ 184:65e1b2e415bb
...
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:31:52 +0900 |
parents | de3d87b7494f |
children | ed88384b5102 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/ordinal.agda Sun Jul 21 17:56:12 2019 +0900 +++ b/ordinal.agda Mon Jul 22 17:31:52 2019 +0900 @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ lv : Nat ord : OrdinalD {n} lv --- --- Φ (Suc lv) < ℵ lv < OSuc (Suc lv) (ℵ lv) < OSuc ... < OSuc (Suc lv) (Φ (Suc lv)) < OSuc ... < ℵ (Suc lv) --- data _d<_ {n : Level} : {lx ly : Nat} → OrdinalD {n} lx → OrdinalD {n} ly → Set n where Φ< : {lx : Nat} → {x : OrdinalD {n} lx} → Φ lx d< OSuc lx x s< : {lx : Nat} → {x y : OrdinalD {n} lx} → x d< y → OSuc lx x d< OSuc lx y @@ -300,8 +297,6 @@ proj2 (osuc2 {n} x y) (case2 lt) with d<→lv lt ... | refl = case2 (s< lt) --- omax≡ (omax x x ) (osuc x) (omxx x) - OrdTrans : {n : Level} → Transitive {suc n} _o≤_ OrdTrans (case1 refl) (case1 refl) = case1 refl OrdTrans (case1 refl) (case2 lt2) = case2 lt2 @@ -327,7 +322,7 @@ TransFinite caseΦ caseOSuc record { lv = lx ; ord = (OSuc lx ox) } = caseOSuc lx ox (TransFinite caseΦ caseOSuc record { lv = lx ; ord = ox }) --- we cannot prove this in intutonistic logic +-- we cannot prove this in intutionistic logic -- (¬ (∀ y → ¬ ( ψ y ))) → (ψ y → p ) → p -- postulate -- TransFiniteExists : {n m l : Level} → ( ψ : Ordinal {n} → Set m )