diff ordinal.agda @ 184:65e1b2e415bb

...
author Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp>
date Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:31:52 +0900
parents de3d87b7494f
children ed88384b5102
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/ordinal.agda	Sun Jul 21 17:56:12 2019 +0900
+++ b/ordinal.agda	Mon Jul 22 17:31:52 2019 +0900
@@ -17,9 +17,6 @@
      lv : Nat
      ord : OrdinalD {n} lv
 
---
---    Φ (Suc lv) < ℵ lv < OSuc (Suc lv) (ℵ lv) < OSuc ... < OSuc (Suc lv) (Φ (Suc lv)) < OSuc ...  < ℵ (Suc lv)
---
 data _d<_ {n : Level} :   {lx ly : Nat} → OrdinalD {n} lx  →  OrdinalD {n} ly  → Set n where
    Φ<  : {lx : Nat} → {x : OrdinalD {n} lx}  →  Φ lx d< OSuc lx x
    s<  : {lx : Nat} → {x y : OrdinalD {n} lx}  →  x d< y  → OSuc  lx x d< OSuc  lx y
@@ -300,8 +297,6 @@
 proj2 (osuc2 {n} x y) (case2 lt) with d<→lv lt
 ... | refl = case2 (s< lt)
 
--- omax≡ (omax x x ) (osuc x) (omxx x)
-
 OrdTrans : {n : Level} → Transitive {suc n} _o≤_
 OrdTrans (case1 refl) (case1 refl) = case1 refl
 OrdTrans (case1 refl) (case2 lt2) = case2 lt2
@@ -327,7 +322,7 @@
 TransFinite caseΦ caseOSuc record { lv = lx ; ord = (OSuc lx ox) } = 
       caseOSuc lx ox (TransFinite caseΦ caseOSuc  record { lv = lx ; ord = ox })
 
--- we cannot prove this in intutonistic logic 
+-- we cannot prove this in intutionistic logic 
 --  (¬ (∀ y → ¬ ( ψ y ))) → (ψ y → p )  → p
 -- postulate 
 --  TransFiniteExists : {n m l : Level} → ( ψ : Ordinal {n} → Set m )