Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > ZF-in-agda
diff BAlgbra.agda @ 272:985a1af11bce
separate ordered pair and Boolean Algebra
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:22:52 +0900 |
parents | |
children | 6f10c47e4e7a |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/BAlgbra.agda Tue Dec 31 11:22:52 2019 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ +open import Level +open import Ordinals +module BAlgbra {n : Level } (O : Ordinals {n}) where + +open import zf +open import logic +import OD + +open import Relation.Nullary +open import Relation.Binary +open import Data.Empty +open import Relation.Binary +open import Relation.Binary.Core +open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality +open import Data.Nat renaming ( zero to Zero ; suc to Suc ; ℕ to Nat ; _⊔_ to _n⊔_ ) + +open inOrdinal O +open OD O +open OD.OD + +open _∧_ +open _∨_ +open Bool + +_∩_ : ( A B : OD ) → OD +A ∩ B = record { def = λ x → def A x ∧ def B x } + +_∪_ : ( A B : OD ) → OD +A ∪ B = record { def = λ x → def A x ∨ def B x } + +_\_ : ( A B : OD ) → OD +A \ B = record { def = λ x → def A x ∧ ( ¬ ( def B x ) ) } + +∪-Union : { A B : OD } → Union (A , B) ≡ ( A ∪ B ) +∪-Union {A} {B} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where + lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → def (Union (A , B)) x → def (A ∪ B) x + lemma1 {x} lt = lemma3 lt where + lemma4 : {y : Ordinal} → def (A , B) y ∧ def (ord→od y) x → ¬ (¬ ( def A x ∨ def B x) ) + lemma4 {y} z with proj1 z + lemma4 {y} z | case1 refl = double-neg (case1 ( subst (λ k → def k x ) oiso (proj2 z)) ) + lemma4 {y} z | case2 refl = double-neg (case2 ( subst (λ k → def k x ) oiso (proj2 z)) ) + lemma3 : (((u : Ordinals.ord O) → ¬ def (A , B) u ∧ def (ord→od u) x) → ⊥) → def (A ∪ B) x + lemma3 not = double-neg-eilm (FExists _ lemma4 not) -- choice + lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → def (A ∪ B) x → def (Union (A , B)) x + lemma2 {x} (case1 A∋x) = subst (λ k → def (Union (A , B)) k) diso ( IsZF.union→ isZF (A , B) (ord→od x) A + (record { proj1 = case1 refl ; proj2 = subst (λ k → def A k) (sym diso) A∋x})) + lemma2 {x} (case2 B∋x) = subst (λ k → def (Union (A , B)) k) diso ( IsZF.union→ isZF (A , B) (ord→od x) B + (record { proj1 = case2 refl ; proj2 = subst (λ k → def B k) (sym diso) B∋x})) + +∩-Select : { A B : OD } → Select A ( λ x → ( A ∋ x ) ∧ ( B ∋ x ) ) ≡ ( A ∩ B ) +∩-Select {A} {B} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where + lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → def (Select A (λ x₁ → (A ∋ x₁) ∧ (B ∋ x₁))) x → def (A ∩ B) x + lemma1 {x} lt = record { proj1 = proj1 lt ; proj2 = subst (λ k → def B k ) diso (proj2 (proj2 lt)) } + lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → def (A ∩ B) x → def (Select A (λ x₁ → (A ∋ x₁) ∧ (B ∋ x₁))) x + lemma2 {x} lt = record { proj1 = proj1 lt ; proj2 = + record { proj1 = subst (λ k → def A k) (sym diso) (proj1 lt) ; proj2 = subst (λ k → def B k ) (sym diso) (proj2 lt) } } + +dist-ord : {p q r : OD } → p ∩ ( q ∪ r ) ≡ ( p ∩ q ) ∪ ( p ∩ r ) +dist-ord {p} {q} {r} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where + lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → def (p ∩ (q ∪ r)) x → def ((p ∩ q) ∪ (p ∩ r)) x + lemma1 {x} lt with proj2 lt + lemma1 {x} lt | case1 q∋x = case1 ( record { proj1 = proj1 lt ; proj2 = q∋x } ) + lemma1 {x} lt | case2 r∋x = case2 ( record { proj1 = proj1 lt ; proj2 = r∋x } ) + lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → def ((p ∩ q) ∪ (p ∩ r)) x → def (p ∩ (q ∪ r)) x + lemma2 {x} (case1 p∩q) = record { proj1 = proj1 p∩q ; proj2 = case1 (proj2 p∩q ) } + lemma2 {x} (case2 p∩r) = record { proj1 = proj1 p∩r ; proj2 = case2 (proj2 p∩r ) } + +dist-ord2 : {p q r : OD } → p ∪ ( q ∩ r ) ≡ ( p ∪ q ) ∩ ( p ∪ r ) +dist-ord2 {p} {q} {r} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where + lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → def (p ∪ (q ∩ r)) x → def ((p ∪ q) ∩ (p ∪ r)) x + lemma1 {x} (case1 cp) = record { proj1 = case1 cp ; proj2 = case1 cp } + lemma1 {x} (case2 cqr) = record { proj1 = case2 (proj1 cqr) ; proj2 = case2 (proj2 cqr) } + lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → def ((p ∪ q) ∩ (p ∪ r)) x → def (p ∪ (q ∩ r)) x + lemma2 {x} lt with proj1 lt | proj2 lt + lemma2 {x} lt | case1 cp | _ = case1 cp + lemma2 {x} lt | _ | case1 cp = case1 cp + lemma2 {x} lt | case2 cq | case2 cr = case2 ( record { proj1 = cq ; proj2 = cr } ) + +record IsBooleanAlgebra ( L : Set n) + ( b1 : L ) + ( b0 : L ) + ( -_ : L → L ) + ( _+_ : L → L → L ) + ( _*_ : L → L → L ) : Set (suc n) where + field + +-assoc : {a b c : L } → a + ( b + c ) ≡ (a + b) + c + *-assoc : {a b c : L } → a * ( b * c ) ≡ (a * b) * c + +-sym : {a b : L } → a + b ≡ b + a + -sym : {a b : L } → a * b ≡ b * a + -aab : {a b : L } → a + ( a * b ) ≡ a + *-aab : {a b : L } → a * ( a + b ) ≡ a + -dist : {a b c : L } → a + ( b * c ) ≡ ( a * b ) + ( a * c ) + *-dist : {a b c : L } → a * ( b + c ) ≡ ( a + b ) * ( a + c ) + a+0 : {a : L } → a + b0 ≡ a + a*1 : {a : L } → a * b1 ≡ a + a+-a1 : {a : L } → a + ( - a ) ≡ b1 + a*-a0 : {a : L } → a * ( - a ) ≡ b0 + +record BooleanAlgebra ( L : Set n) : Set (suc n) where + field + b1 : L + b0 : L + -_ : L → L + _++_ : L → L → L + _**_ : L → L → L + isBooleanAlgebra : IsBooleanAlgebra L b1 b0 -_ _++_ _**_ +