open import Level open import Ordinals module OD {n : Level } (O : Ordinals {n} ) where open import zf open import Data.Nat renaming ( zero to Zero ; suc to Suc ; ℕ to Nat ; _⊔_ to _n⊔_ ) open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality open import Data.Nat.Properties open import Data.Empty open import Relation.Nullary open import Relation.Binary open import Relation.Binary.Core open import logic open import nat open inOrdinal O -- Ordinal Definable Set record OD : Set (suc n ) where field def : (x : Ordinal ) → Set n open OD open _∧_ open _∨_ open Bool record _==_ ( a b : OD ) : Set n where field eq→ : ∀ { x : Ordinal } → def a x → def b x eq← : ∀ { x : Ordinal } → def b x → def a x id : {A : Set n} → A → A id x = x ==-refl : { x : OD } → x == x ==-refl {x} = record { eq→ = id ; eq← = id } open _==_ ==-trans : { x y z : OD } → x == y → y == z → x == z ==-trans x=y y=z = record { eq→ = λ {m} t → eq→ y=z (eq→ x=y t) ; eq← = λ {m} t → eq← x=y (eq← y=z t) } ==-sym : { x y : OD } → x == y → y == x ==-sym x=y = record { eq→ = λ {m} t → eq← x=y t ; eq← = λ {m} t → eq→ x=y t } ⇔→== : { x y : OD } → ( {z : Ordinal } → def x z ⇔ def y z) → x == y eq→ ( ⇔→== {x} {y} eq ) {z} m = proj1 eq m eq← ( ⇔→== {x} {y} eq ) {z} m = proj2 eq m -- Ordinal in OD ( and ZFSet ) Transitive Set Ord : ( a : Ordinal ) → OD Ord a = record { def = λ y → y o< a } od∅ : OD od∅ = Ord o∅ -- next assumptions are our axiom -- it defines a subset of OD, which is called HOD, usually defined as -- HOD = { x | TC x ⊆ OD } -- where TC x is a transitive clusure of x, i.e. Union of all elemnts of all subset of x postulate -- OD can be iso to a subset of Ordinal ( by means of Godel Set ) od→ord : OD → Ordinal ord→od : Ordinal → OD c<→o< : {x y : OD } → def y ( od→ord x ) → od→ord x o< od→ord y oiso : {x : OD } → ord→od ( od→ord x ) ≡ x diso : {x : Ordinal } → od→ord ( ord→od x ) ≡ x ==→o≡ : { x y : OD } → (x == y) → x ≡ y -- next assumption causes ∀ x ∋ ∅ . It menas only an ordinal is allowed as OD -- o<→c< : {n : Level} {x y : Ordinal } → x o< y → def (ord→od y) x -- ord→od x ≡ Ord x results the same -- supermum as Replacement Axiom ( this assumes Ordinal has some upper bound ) sup-o : ( Ordinal → Ordinal ) → Ordinal sup-o< : { ψ : Ordinal → Ordinal } → ∀ {x : Ordinal } → ψ x o< sup-o ψ -- contra-position of mimimulity of supermum required in Power Set Axiom -- sup-x : {n : Level } → ( Ordinal → Ordinal ) → Ordinal -- sup-lb : {n : Level } → { ψ : Ordinal → Ordinal } → {z : Ordinal } → z o< sup-o ψ → z o< osuc (ψ (sup-x ψ)) -- mimimul and x∋minimal is an Axiom of choice minimal : (x : OD ) → ¬ (x == od∅ )→ OD -- this should be ¬ (x == od∅ )→ ∃ ox → x ∋ Ord ox ( minimum of x ) x∋minimal : (x : OD ) → ( ne : ¬ (x == od∅ ) ) → def x ( od→ord ( minimal x ne ) ) -- minimality (may proved by ε-induction ) minimal-1 : (x : OD ) → ( ne : ¬ (x == od∅ ) ) → (y : OD ) → ¬ ( def (minimal x ne) (od→ord y)) ∧ (def x (od→ord y) ) o<→c<→OD=Ord : ( {x y : Ordinal } → x o< y → def (ord→od y) x ) → {x : OD } → x ≡ Ord (od→ord x) o<→c<→OD=Ord o<→c< {x} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where lemma1 : {y : Ordinal} → def x y → def (Ord (od→ord x)) y lemma1 {y} lt = subst ( λ k → k o< od→ord x ) diso (c<→o< {ord→od y} {x} (subst (λ k → def x k ) (sym diso) lt)) lemma2 : {y : Ordinal} → def (Ord (od→ord x)) y → def x y lemma2 {y} lt = subst (λ k → def k y ) oiso (o<→c< {y} {od→ord x} lt ) _∋_ : ( a x : OD ) → Set n _∋_ a x = def a ( od→ord x ) _c<_ : ( x a : OD ) → Set n x c< a = a ∋ x cseq : {n : Level} → OD → OD cseq x = record { def = λ y → def x (osuc y) } where def-subst : {Z : OD } {X : Ordinal }{z : OD } {x : Ordinal }→ def Z X → Z ≡ z → X ≡ x → def z x def-subst df refl refl = df sup-od : ( OD → OD ) → OD sup-od ψ = Ord ( sup-o ( λ x → od→ord (ψ (ord→od x ))) ) sup-c< : ( ψ : OD → OD ) → ∀ {x : OD } → def ( sup-od ψ ) (od→ord ( ψ x )) sup-c< ψ {x} = def-subst {_} {_} {Ord ( sup-o ( λ x → od→ord (ψ (ord→od x ))) )} {od→ord ( ψ x )} lemma refl (cong ( λ k → od→ord (ψ k) ) oiso) where lemma : od→ord (ψ (ord→od (od→ord x))) o< sup-o (λ x → od→ord (ψ (ord→od x))) lemma = subst₂ (λ j k → j o< k ) refl diso (o<-subst (sup-o< ) refl (sym diso) ) otrans : {n : Level} {a x y : Ordinal } → def (Ord a) x → def (Ord x) y → def (Ord a) y otrans x ¬a ¬b c = no ¬b _,_ : OD → OD → OD x , y = record { def = λ t → (t ≡ od→ord x ) ∨ ( t ≡ od→ord y ) } -- Ord (omax (od→ord x) (od→ord y)) <_,_> : (x y : OD) → OD < x , y > = (x , x ) , (x , y ) exg-pair : { x y : OD } → (x , y ) == ( y , x ) exg-pair {x} {y} = record { eq→ = left ; eq← = right } where left : {z : Ordinal} → def (x , y) z → def (y , x) z left (case1 t) = case2 t left (case2 t) = case1 t right : {z : Ordinal} → def (y , x) z → def (x , y) z right (case1 t) = case2 t right (case2 t) = case1 t ord≡→≡ : { x y : OD } → od→ord x ≡ od→ord y → x ≡ y ord≡→≡ eq = subst₂ (λ j k → j ≡ k ) oiso oiso ( cong ( λ k → ord→od k ) eq ) od≡→≡ : { x y : Ordinal } → ord→od x ≡ ord→od y → x ≡ y od≡→≡ eq = subst₂ (λ j k → j ≡ k ) diso diso ( cong ( λ k → od→ord k ) eq ) eq-prod : { x x' y y' : OD } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → < x , y > ≡ < x' , y' > eq-prod refl refl = refl prod-eq : { x x' y y' : OD } → < x , y > == < x' , y' > → (x ≡ x' ) ∧ ( y ≡ y' ) prod-eq {x} {x'} {y} {y'} eq = record { proj1 = lemmax ; proj2 = lemmay } where lemma0 : {x y z : OD } → ( x , x ) == ( z , y ) → x ≡ y lemma0 {x} {y} eq with trio< (od→ord x) (od→ord y) lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c with eq← eq {od→ord y} (case2 refl) lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c | case1 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ (sym s) a ) lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c | case2 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ (sym s) a ) lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = ord≡→≡ b lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c with eq← eq {od→ord y} (case2 refl) lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c | case1 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ s c ) lemma0 {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c | case2 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ s c ) lemma2 : {x y z : OD } → ( x , x ) == ( z , y ) → z ≡ y lemma2 {x} {y} {z} eq = trans (sym (lemma0 lemma3 )) ( lemma0 eq ) where lemma3 : ( x , x ) == ( y , z ) lemma3 = ==-trans eq exg-pair lemma1 : {x y : OD } → ( x , x ) == ( y , y ) → x ≡ y lemma1 {x} {y} eq with eq← eq {od→ord y} (case2 refl) lemma1 {x} {y} eq | case1 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) lemma1 {x} {y} eq | case2 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) lemma4 : {x y z : OD } → ( x , y ) == ( x , z ) → y ≡ z lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq with eq← eq {od→ord z} (case2 refl) lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq | case1 s with ord≡→≡ s -- x ≡ z ... | refl with lemma2 (==-sym eq ) ... | refl = refl lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq | case2 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) -- y ≡ z lemmax : x ≡ x' lemmax with eq→ eq {od→ord (x , x)} (case1 refl) lemmax | case1 s = lemma1 (ord→== s ) -- (x,x)≡(x',x') lemmax | case2 s with lemma2 (ord→== s ) -- (x,x)≡(x',y') with x'≡y' ... | refl = lemma1 (ord→== s ) lemmay : y ≡ y' lemmay with lemmax ... | refl with lemma4 eq -- with (x,y)≡(x,y') ... | eq1 = lemma4 (ord→== (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) eq1 )) data ord-pair : (p : Ordinal) → Set n where pair : (x y : Ordinal ) → ord-pair ( od→ord ( < ord→od x , ord→od y > ) ) ZFProduct : OD ZFProduct = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x } -- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) -- eq-pair : { x x' y y' : Ordinal } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → pair x y ≅ pair x' y' -- eq-pair refl refl = HE.refl pi1 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal pi1 ( pair x y) = x π1 : { p : OD } → ZFProduct ∋ p → OD π1 lt = ord→od (pi1 lt ) pi2 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal pi2 ( pair x y ) = y π2 : { p : OD } → ZFProduct ∋ p → OD π2 lt = ord→od (pi2 lt ) op-cons : { ox oy : Ordinal } → ZFProduct ∋ < ord→od ox , ord→od oy > op-cons {ox} {oy} = pair ox oy p-cons : ( x y : OD ) → ZFProduct ∋ < x , y > p-cons x y = def-subst {_} {_} {ZFProduct} {od→ord (< x , y >)} (pair (od→ord x) ( od→ord y )) refl ( let open ≡-Reasoning in begin od→ord < ord→od (od→ord x) , ord→od (od→ord y) > ≡⟨ cong₂ (λ j k → od→ord < j , k >) oiso oiso ⟩ od→ord < x , y > ∎ ) op-iso : { op : Ordinal } → (q : ord-pair op ) → od→ord < ord→od (pi1 q) , ord→od (pi2 q) > ≡ op op-iso (pair ox oy) = refl p-iso : { x : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ x ) → < π1 p , π2 p > ≡ x p-iso {x} p = ord≡→≡ (op-iso p) p-pi1 : { x y : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ < x , y > ) → π1 p ≡ x p-pi1 {x} {y} p = proj1 ( prod-eq ( ord→== (op-iso p) )) p-pi2 : { x y : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ < x , y > ) → π2 p ≡ y p-pi2 {x} {y} p = proj2 ( prod-eq ( ord→== (op-iso p))) -- -- Axiom of choice in intutionistic logic implies the exclude middle -- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/axiom-choice/#AxiChoLog -- ppp : { p : Set n } { a : OD } → record { def = λ x → p } ∋ a → p ppp {p} {a} d = d p∨¬p : ( p : Set n ) → p ∨ ( ¬ p ) -- assuming axiom of choice p∨¬p p with is-o∅ ( od→ord ( record { def = λ x → p } )) p∨¬p p | yes eq = case2 (¬p eq) where ps = record { def = λ x → p } lemma : ps == od∅ → p → ⊥ lemma eq p0 = ¬x<0 {od→ord ps} (eq→ eq p0 ) ¬p : (od→ord ps ≡ o∅) → p → ⊥ ¬p eq = lemma ( subst₂ (λ j k → j == k ) oiso o∅≡od∅ ( o≡→== eq )) p∨¬p p | no ¬p = case1 (ppp {p} {minimal ps (λ eq → ¬p (eqo∅ eq))} lemma) where ps = record { def = λ x → p } eqo∅ : ps == od∅ → od→ord ps ≡ o∅ eqo∅ eq = subst (λ k → od→ord ps ≡ k) ord-od∅ ( cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ eq)) lemma : ps ∋ minimal ps (λ eq → ¬p (eqo∅ eq)) lemma = x∋minimal ps (λ eq → ¬p (eqo∅ eq)) decp : ( p : Set n ) → Dec p -- assuming axiom of choice decp p with p∨¬p p decp p | case1 x = yes x decp p | case2 x = no x double-neg-eilm : {A : Set n} → ¬ ¬ A → A -- we don't have this in intutionistic logic double-neg-eilm {A} notnot with decp A -- assuming axiom of choice ... | yes p = p ... | no ¬p = ⊥-elim ( notnot ¬p ) OrdP : ( x : Ordinal ) ( y : OD ) → Dec ( Ord x ∋ y ) OrdP x y with trio< x (od→ord y) OrdP x y | tri< a ¬b ¬c = no ¬c OrdP x y | tri≈ ¬a refl ¬c = no ( o<¬≡ refl ) OrdP x y | tri> ¬a ¬b c = yes c -- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) -- postulate f-extensionality : { n : Level} → Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality.Extensionality n (suc n) in-codomain : (X : OD ) → ( ψ : OD → OD ) → OD in-codomain X ψ = record { def = λ x → ¬ ( (y : Ordinal ) → ¬ ( def X y ∧ ( x ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y ))))) } -- Power Set of X ( or constructible by λ y → def X (od→ord y ) ZFSubset : (A x : OD ) → OD ZFSubset A x = record { def = λ y → def A y ∧ def x y } -- roughly x = A → Set Def : (A : OD ) → OD Def A = Ord ( sup-o ( λ x → od→ord ( ZFSubset A (ord→od x )) ) ) -- _⊆_ : ( A B : OD ) → ∀{ x : OD } → Set n -- _⊆_ A B {x} = A ∋ x → B ∋ x record _⊆_ ( A B : OD ) : Set (suc n) where field incl : { x : OD } → A ∋ x → B ∋ x open _⊆_ infixr 220 _⊆_ subset-lemma : {A x : OD } → ( {y : OD } → x ∋ y → ZFSubset A x ∋ y ) ⇔ ( x ⊆ A ) subset-lemma {A} {x} = record { proj1 = λ lt → record { incl = λ x∋z → proj1 (lt x∋z) } ; proj2 = λ x⊆A lt → record { proj1 = incl x⊆A lt ; proj2 = lt } } open import Data.Unit ε-induction : { ψ : OD → Set (suc n)} → ( {x : OD } → ({ y : OD } → x ∋ y → ψ y ) → ψ x ) → (x : OD ) → ψ x ε-induction {ψ} ind x = subst (λ k → ψ k ) oiso (ε-induction-ord (osuc (od→ord x)) <-osuc ) where induction : (ox : Ordinal) → ((oy : Ordinal) → oy o< ox → ψ (ord→od oy)) → ψ (ord→od ox) induction ox prev = ind ( λ {y} lt → subst (λ k → ψ k ) oiso (prev (od→ord y) (o<-subst (c<→o< lt) refl diso ))) ε-induction-ord : (ox : Ordinal) { oy : Ordinal } → oy o< ox → ψ (ord→od oy) ε-induction-ord ox {oy} lt = TransFinite {λ oy → ψ (ord→od oy)} induction oy -- minimal-2 : (x : OD ) → ( ne : ¬ (x == od∅ ) ) → (y : OD ) → ¬ ( def (minimal x ne) (od→ord y)) ∧ (def x (od→ord y) ) -- minimal-2 x ne y = contra-position ( ε-induction (λ {z} ind → {!!} ) x ) ( λ p → {!!} ) OD→ZF : ZF OD→ZF = record { ZFSet = OD ; _∋_ = _∋_ ; _≈_ = _==_ ; ∅ = od∅ ; _,_ = _,_ ; Union = Union ; Power = Power ; Select = Select ; Replace = Replace ; infinite = infinite ; isZF = isZF } where ZFSet = OD Select : (X : OD ) → ((x : OD ) → Set n ) → OD Select X ψ = record { def = λ x → ( def X x ∧ ψ ( ord→od x )) } Replace : OD → (OD → OD ) → OD Replace X ψ = record { def = λ x → (x o< sup-o ( λ x → od→ord (ψ (ord→od x )))) ∧ def (in-codomain X ψ) x } _∩_ : ( A B : ZFSet ) → ZFSet A ∩ B = record { def = λ x → def A x ∧ def B x } Union : OD → OD Union U = record { def = λ x → ¬ (∀ (u : Ordinal ) → ¬ ((def U u) ∧ (def (ord→od u) x))) } _∈_ : ( A B : ZFSet ) → Set n A ∈ B = B ∋ A Power : OD → OD Power A = Replace (Def (Ord (od→ord A))) ( λ x → A ∩ x ) {_} : ZFSet → ZFSet { x } = ( x , x ) data infinite-d : ( x : Ordinal ) → Set n where iφ : infinite-d o∅ isuc : {x : Ordinal } → infinite-d x → infinite-d (od→ord ( Union (ord→od x , (ord→od x , ord→od x ) ) )) infinite : OD infinite = record { def = λ x → infinite-d x } infixr 200 _∈_ -- infixr 230 _∩_ _∪_ isZF : IsZF (OD ) _∋_ _==_ od∅ _,_ Union Power Select Replace infinite isZF = record { isEquivalence = record { refl = ==-refl ; sym = ==-sym; trans = ==-trans } ; pair→ = pair→ ; pair← = pair← ; union→ = union→ ; union← = union← ; empty = empty ; power→ = power→ ; power← = power← ; extensionality = λ {A} {B} {w} → extensionality {A} {B} {w} -- ; ε-induction = {!!} ; infinity∅ = infinity∅ ; infinity = infinity ; selection = λ {X} {ψ} {y} → selection {X} {ψ} {y} ; replacement← = replacement← ; replacement→ = replacement→ ; choice-func = choice-func ; choice = choice } where pair→ : ( x y t : ZFSet ) → (x , y) ∋ t → ( t == x ) ∨ ( t == y ) pair→ x y t (case1 t≡x ) = case1 (subst₂ (λ j k → j == k ) oiso oiso (o≡→== t≡x )) pair→ x y t (case2 t≡y ) = case2 (subst₂ (λ j k → j == k ) oiso oiso (o≡→== t≡y )) pair← : ( x y t : ZFSet ) → ( t == x ) ∨ ( t == y ) → (x , y) ∋ t pair← x y t (case1 t==x) = case1 (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ t==x)) pair← x y t (case2 t==y) = case2 (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ t==y)) empty : (x : OD ) → ¬ (od∅ ∋ x) empty x = ¬x<0 o<→c< : {x y : Ordinal } → x o< y → (Ord x) ⊆ (Ord y) o<→c< lt = record { incl = λ z → ordtrans z lt } ⊆→o< : {x y : Ordinal } → (Ord x) ⊆ (Ord y) → x o< osuc y ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt with trio< x y ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri< a ¬b ¬c = ordtrans a <-osuc ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = subst ( λ k → k o< osuc y) (sym b) <-osuc ⊆→o< {x} {y} lt | tri> ¬a ¬b c with (incl lt) (o<-subst c (sym diso) refl ) ... | ttt = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ refl (o<-subst ttt diso refl )) union→ : (X z u : OD) → (X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z) → Union X ∋ z union→ X z u xx not = ⊥-elim ( not (od→ord u) ( record { proj1 = proj1 xx ; proj2 = subst ( λ k → def k (od→ord z)) (sym oiso) (proj2 xx) } )) union← : (X z : OD) (X∋z : Union X ∋ z) → ¬ ( (u : OD ) → ¬ ((X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z ))) union← X z UX∋z = FExists _ lemma UX∋z where lemma : {y : Ordinal} → def X y ∧ def (ord→od y) (od→ord z) → ¬ ((u : OD) → ¬ (X ∋ u) ∧ (u ∋ z)) lemma {y} xx not = not (ord→od y) record { proj1 = subst ( λ k → def X k ) (sym diso) (proj1 xx ) ; proj2 = proj2 xx } ψiso : {ψ : OD → Set n} {x y : OD } → ψ x → x ≡ y → ψ y ψiso {ψ} t refl = t selection : {ψ : OD → Set n} {X y : OD} → ((X ∋ y) ∧ ψ y) ⇔ (Select X ψ ∋ y) selection {ψ} {X} {y} = record { proj1 = λ cond → record { proj1 = proj1 cond ; proj2 = ψiso {ψ} (proj2 cond) (sym oiso) } ; proj2 = λ select → record { proj1 = proj1 select ; proj2 = ψiso {ψ} (proj2 select) oiso } } replacement← : {ψ : OD → OD} (X x : OD) → X ∋ x → Replace X ψ ∋ ψ x replacement← {ψ} X x lt = record { proj1 = sup-c< ψ {x} ; proj2 = lemma } where lemma : def (in-codomain X ψ) (od→ord (ψ x)) lemma not = ⊥-elim ( not ( od→ord x ) (record { proj1 = lt ; proj2 = cong (λ k → od→ord (ψ k)) (sym oiso)} )) replacement→ : {ψ : OD → OD} (X x : OD) → (lt : Replace X ψ ∋ x) → ¬ ( (y : OD) → ¬ (x == ψ y)) replacement→ {ψ} X x lt = contra-position lemma (lemma2 (proj2 lt)) where lemma2 : ¬ ((y : Ordinal) → ¬ def X y ∧ ((od→ord x) ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y)))) → ¬ ((y : Ordinal) → ¬ def X y ∧ (ord→od (od→ord x) == ψ (ord→od y))) lemma2 not not2 = not ( λ y d → not2 y (record { proj1 = proj1 d ; proj2 = lemma3 (proj2 d)})) where lemma3 : {y : Ordinal } → (od→ord x ≡ od→ord (ψ (ord→od y))) → (ord→od (od→ord x) == ψ (ord→od y)) lemma3 {y} eq = subst (λ k → ord→od (od→ord x) == k ) oiso (o≡→== eq ) lemma : ( (y : OD) → ¬ (x == ψ y)) → ( (y : Ordinal) → ¬ def X y ∧ (ord→od (od→ord x) == ψ (ord→od y)) ) lemma not y not2 = not (ord→od y) (subst (λ k → k == ψ (ord→od y)) oiso ( proj2 not2 )) --- --- Power Set --- --- First consider ordinals in OD --- --- ZFSubset A x = record { def = λ y → def A y ∧ def x y } subset of A -- -- ∩-≡ : { a b : OD } → ({x : OD } → (a ∋ x → b ∋ x)) → a == ( b ∩ a ) ∩-≡ {a} {b} inc = record { eq→ = λ {x} x axiom of choice --- record choiced ( X : OD) : Set (suc n) where field a-choice : OD is-in : X ∋ a-choice choice-func' : (X : OD ) → (p∨¬p : ( p : Set (suc n)) → p ∨ ( ¬ p )) → ¬ ( X == od∅ ) → choiced X choice-func' X p∨¬p not = have_to_find where ψ : ( ox : Ordinal ) → Set (suc n) ψ ox = (( x : Ordinal ) → x o< ox → ( ¬ def X x )) ∨ choiced X lemma-ord : ( ox : Ordinal ) → ψ ox lemma-ord ox = TransFinite {ψ} induction ox where ∋-p : (A x : OD ) → Dec ( A ∋ x ) ∋-p A x with p∨¬p (Lift (suc n) ( A ∋ x )) -- LEM ∋-p A x | case1 (lift t) = yes t ∋-p A x | case2 t = no (λ x → t (lift x )) ∀-imply-or : {A : Ordinal → Set n } {B : Set (suc n) } → ((x : Ordinal ) → A x ∨ B) → ((x : Ordinal ) → A x) ∨ B ∀-imply-or {A} {B} ∀AB with p∨¬p (Lift ( suc n ) ((x : Ordinal ) → A x)) -- LEM ∀-imply-or {A} {B} ∀AB | case1 (lift t) = case1 t ∀-imply-or {A} {B} ∀AB | case2 x = case2 (lemma (λ not → x (lift not ))) where lemma : ¬ ((x : Ordinal ) → A x) → B lemma not with p∨¬p B lemma not | case1 b = b lemma not | case2 ¬b = ⊥-elim (not (λ x → dont-orb (∀AB x) ¬b )) induction : (x : Ordinal) → ((y : Ordinal) → y o< x → ψ y) → ψ x induction x prev with ∋-p X ( ord→od x) ... | yes p = case2 ( record { a-choice = ord→od x ; is-in = p } ) ... | no ¬p = lemma where lemma1 : (y : Ordinal) → (y o< x → def X y → ⊥) ∨ choiced X lemma1 y with ∋-p X (ord→od y) lemma1 y | yes y