# HG changeset patch # User Shinji KONO # Date 1567147024 -32400 # Node ID 53b7acd63481d334f7631c6a234ba8859abc7711 # Parent 1eba96b7ab8db4e2b31549f0c94d7d6ab9051c49 move product to OD diff -r 1eba96b7ab8d -r 53b7acd63481 OD.agda --- a/OD.agda Thu Aug 29 16:17:02 2019 +0900 +++ b/OD.agda Fri Aug 30 15:37:04 2019 +0900 @@ -235,13 +235,59 @@ ... | refl with lemma4 eq -- with (x,y)≡(x,y') ... | eq1 = lemma4 (ord→== (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) eq1 )) -ppp : { p : Set n } { a : OD } → record { def = λ x → p } ∋ a → p -ppp {p} {a} d = d +data ord-pair : (p : Ordinal) → Set n where + pair : (x y : Ordinal ) → ord-pair ( od→ord ( < ord→od x , ord→od y > ) ) + +ZFProduct : OD +ZFProduct = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x } + +-- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) +-- eq-pair : { x x' y y' : Ordinal } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → pair x y ≅ pair x' y' +-- eq-pair refl refl = HE.refl + +pi1 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal +pi1 ( pair x y) = x + +π1 : { p : OD } → ZFProduct ∋ p → OD +π1 lt = ord→od (pi1 lt ) + +pi2 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal +pi2 ( pair x y ) = y + +π2 : { p : OD } → ZFProduct ∋ p → OD +π2 lt = ord→od (pi2 lt ) + +op-cons : { ox oy : Ordinal } → ZFProduct ∋ < ord→od ox , ord→od oy > +op-cons {ox} {oy} = pair ox oy + +p-cons : ( x y : OD ) → ZFProduct ∋ < x , y > +p-cons x y = def-subst {_} {_} {ZFProduct} {od→ord (< x , y >)} (pair (od→ord x) ( od→ord y )) refl ( + let open ≡-Reasoning in begin + od→ord < ord→od (od→ord x) , ord→od (od→ord y) > + ≡⟨ cong₂ (λ j k → od→ord < j , k >) oiso oiso ⟩ + od→ord < x , y > + ∎ ) + +op-iso : { op : Ordinal } → (q : ord-pair op ) → od→ord < ord→od (pi1 q) , ord→od (pi2 q) > ≡ op +op-iso (pair ox oy) = refl + +p-iso : { x : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ x ) → < π1 p , π2 p > ≡ x +p-iso {x} p = ord≡→≡ (op-iso p) + +p-pi1 : { x y : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ < x , y > ) → π1 p ≡ x +p-pi1 {x} {y} p = proj1 ( prod-eq ( ord→== (op-iso p) )) + +p-pi2 : { x y : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ < x , y > ) → π2 p ≡ y +p-pi2 {x} {y} p = proj2 ( prod-eq ( ord→== (op-iso p))) -- -- Axiom of choice in intutionistic logic implies the exclude middle -- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/axiom-choice/#AxiChoLog -- + +ppp : { p : Set n } { a : OD } → record { def = λ x → p } ∋ a → p +ppp {p} {a} d = d + p∨¬p : ( p : Set n ) → p ∨ ( ¬ p ) -- assuming axiom of choice p∨¬p p with is-o∅ ( od→ord ( record { def = λ x → p } )) p∨¬p p | yes eq = case2 (¬p eq) where @@ -299,20 +345,6 @@ ; proj2 = λ x⊆A lt → record { proj1 = x⊆A lt ; proj2 = lt } } --- Constructible Set on α --- Def X = record { def = λ y → ∀ (x : OD ) → y < X ∧ y < od→ord x } --- L (Φ 0) = Φ --- L (OSuc lv n) = { Def ( L n ) } --- L (Φ (Suc n)) = Union (L α) (α < Φ (Suc n) ) --- L : {n : Level} → (α : Ordinal ) → OD --- L record { lv = Zero ; ord = (Φ .0) } = od∅ --- L record { lv = lx ; ord = (OSuc lv ox) } = Def ( L ( record { lv = lx ; ord = ox } ) ) --- L record { lv = (Suc lx) ; ord = (Φ (Suc lx)) } = -- Union ( L α ) --- cseq ( Ord (od→ord (L (record { lv = lx ; ord = Φ lx })))) - --- L0 : {n : Level} → (α : Ordinal ) → L (osuc α) ∋ L α --- L1 : {n : Level} → (α β : Ordinal ) → α o< β → ∀ (x : OD ) → L α ∋ x → L β ∋ x - OD→ZF : ZF OD→ZF = record { ZFSet = OD @@ -382,10 +414,6 @@ pair← x y t (case1 t==x) = case1 (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ t==x)) pair← x y t (case2 t==y) = case2 (cong (λ k → od→ord k ) (==→o≡ t==y)) - -- pair0 : (A B : OD ) → ((A , B) ∋ A) ∧ ((A , B) ∋ B) - -- proj1 (pair A B ) = omax-x (od→ord A) (od→ord B) - -- proj2 (pair A B ) = omax-y (od→ord A) (od→ord B) - empty : (x : OD ) → ¬ (od∅ ∋ x) empty x = ¬x<0 diff -r 1eba96b7ab8d -r 53b7acd63481 cardinal.agda --- a/cardinal.agda Thu Aug 29 16:17:02 2019 +0900 +++ b/cardinal.agda Fri Aug 30 15:37:04 2019 +0900 @@ -24,46 +24,6 @@ -- we have to work on Ordinal to keep OD Level n -- since we use p∨¬p which works only on Level n --- < x , y > = (x , x) , (x , y) - -data ord-pair : (p : Ordinal) → Set n where - pair : (x y : Ordinal ) → ord-pair ( od→ord ( < ord→od x , ord→od y > ) ) - -ZFProduct : OD -ZFProduct = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x } - --- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) --- eq-pair : { x x' y y' : Ordinal } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → pair x y ≅ pair x' y' --- eq-pair refl refl = HE.refl - -pi1 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal -pi1 ( pair x y) = x - -π1 : { p : OD } → ZFProduct ∋ p → Ordinal -π1 lt = pi1 lt - -pi2 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal -pi2 ( pair x y ) = y - -π2 : { p : OD } → ZFProduct ∋ p → Ordinal -π2 lt = pi2 lt - -p-cons : ( x y : OD ) → ZFProduct ∋ < x , y > -p-cons x y = def-subst {_} {_} {ZFProduct} {od→ord (< x , y >)} (pair (od→ord x) ( od→ord y )) refl ( - let open ≡-Reasoning in begin - od→ord < ord→od (od→ord x) , ord→od (od→ord y) > - ≡⟨ cong₂ (λ j k → od→ord < j , k >) oiso oiso ⟩ - od→ord < x , y > - ∎ ) - - -p-iso1 : { ox oy : Ordinal } → ZFProduct ∋ < ord→od ox , ord→od oy > -p-iso1 {ox} {oy} = pair ox oy - -p-iso : { x : OD } → (p : ZFProduct ∋ x ) → < ord→od (π1 p) , ord→od (π2 p) > ≡ x -p-iso {x} p = ord≡→≡ (lemma p) where - lemma : { op : Ordinal } → (q : ord-pair op ) → od→ord < ord→od (pi1 q) , ord→od (pi2 q) > ≡ op - lemma (pair ox oy) = refl ∋-p : (A x : OD ) → Dec ( A ∋ x )