111
|
1 // { dg-do compile }
|
|
2 // { dg-options "-std=gnu++98" }
|
|
3 // Origin: <tilps at hotmail dot com>
|
|
4 // c++/9154: poor error message for ">>" vs "> >" in template argument list
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
7 /*
|
|
8 * Test that the error message is issued properly
|
|
9 */
|
|
10 template <class T>
|
|
11 class A {};
|
|
12
|
|
13 A<A<int>> blah; // { dg-error "should be '> >' within" }
|
|
14 A<int>> blah2; // { dg-error "spurious '>>'" }
|
|
15
|
|
16
|
|
17 /*
|
|
18 * Test that a few valid constructs containing a ">>" token in a
|
|
19 * template argument list are handled correctly.
|
|
20 */
|
|
21 template <int N>
|
|
22 void B(void) {}
|
|
23
|
|
24 int Btest()
|
|
25 {
|
|
26 B<256 >> 4>();
|
|
27 }
|
|
28
|
|
29 template <int N = 123>>4>
|
|
30 struct C {};
|
|
31
|
|
32 template <int> struct D {};
|
|
33 template <typename> struct E {};
|
|
34
|
|
35 E<D< 1>>2 > > E1;
|
|
36
|
|
37 const int x = 0;
|
|
38 E<D< 1>>x > > E2;
|
|
39
|
|
40 template <int> struct F {
|
|
41 typedef int I;
|
|
42 };
|
|
43
|
|
44 template <typename T = F< 1>>2 >::I>
|
|
45 struct G {};
|
|
46
|
|
47 /*
|
|
48 * In this special case, a valid type-id (H() is a function type) is followed
|
|
49 * by '>>', but the argument should still be parsed as an expression, which
|
|
50 * will then be rejected as non-constant expression.
|
|
51 */
|
|
52 struct H
|
|
53 {
|
|
54 int operator >>(int);
|
|
55 };
|
|
56
|
|
57 template <int V> struct L {};
|
|
58 L<H() >> 5> l; // { dg-error "" "non-constant" }
|
|
59
|
|
60
|
|
61 /*
|
|
62 * This case used to not emit the nice error message because of a typo
|
|
63 * in the code.
|
|
64 */
|
|
65 template <void (*)(void)>
|
|
66 struct K {};
|
|
67
|
|
68 void KFunc(void);
|
|
69
|
|
70 A<K<&KFunc>> k1; // { dg-error "" }
|
|
71 K<&KFunc>> k2; // { dg-error "" }
|