--- a/paper/rectype.ind	Sat Jun 16 04:44:41 2012 +0900
+++ b/paper/rectype.ind	Sat Jun 16 04:51:54 2012 +0900
@@ -336,10 +336,11 @@
 AST is almost the same should be created both.
 Therefore, there should be no difference was the result.
 
-Here is the result.
 
 
 
+Here is the result in x64 architecture (Table\ref{tab:compare}).
+conv1 1 is function call. conv1 2, conv1 3 is optimized CPS transformed source.
 
 \begin{table}[htpb]
 \centering
@@ -347,27 +348,15 @@
 \begin{tabular}{|l|r|r|r|} \hline
 & ./conv1 1 & ./conv1 2 &  ./conv1 3 \\ \hline
 GCC-4.4.3(-O2)   & 3.096 & 1.092 & 1.632 \\ \hline
-GCC-4.6.0(-O2)     & 1.656 & 1.101 & 1.086 \\ \hline
-\end{tabular}
-\caption{GCC bench mark O2 option(in sec)}
-\label{tab:compareO2option}
-\end{table}
-
-\begin{table}[htpb]
-\centering
-\small
-\begin{tabular}{|l|r|r|r|} \hline
-& ./conv1 1 & ./conv1 2 &  ./conv1 3 \\ \hline
+GCC-4.6.0(-O2)     & 1.656 & 1.101 & 1.086 \\ \hline \hline
 GCC-4.4.3(-O3)   & 1.642 & 0.247 & 1.104 \\ \hline
 GCC-4.6.0(-O3)     & 1.674 & 0.280 & 1.127 \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}
-\caption{GCC bench mark O3 option(in sec)}
-\label{tab:compareO3option}
+\caption{GCC bench mark(in sec)}
+\label{tab:compare}
 \end{table}
 
 
-
-
 --Conclusion